Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Metabo_Dave

Preview
Bhattacharya Appropriation Oversight Hearing NIH testifying to Congress on 03/17/2026 [YouTube Link] 20:18 – lauding NIH funded research for the latest highly promising HIV medications which have the potential for an eradication success…

Bhattacharya Appropriation Oversight Hearing drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2026/03/17/b...

1 month ago 15 12 1 1

Thanks Biden

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Yes

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Yeh but he gave me a free cell phone, so he's off the hook.

1 month ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Thanks Biden

1 month ago 4 2 1 0
Post image

"My name may be forgotten when it comes, but the time will arrive when great outbreaks of cholera will be things of the past. And it is the knowledge of the way in which the disease is propagated which will cause them to disappear"

Happy birthday to John Snow! His name & his work is not forgotten.

1 month ago 695 163 17 12

Better than the MLS

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

The only thing we can control is submitting the best proposals we can and max out the 6 sub per year limit, and go in as Co-Investigator on as many other proposals as possible. Maximize the chances by maximizing submissions. Everything else is up to the fates and not worth spending mental energy on

1 month ago 15 4 4 0

Here is the "effective payline" for each institute, estimated (by Claude) as the percentile where one can expect 80% probability of funding from a logistic regression fit. The effective payline has gone from a historic ~12% to 6% in 2025.

1 month ago 97 69 15 14

Some shit is about to go down with NIH study sections, friends. Keep your eyes peeled for change that may affect your grant submissions.

1 month ago 83 39 7 7

Most labs are always a single grant away from going under

1 month ago 28 7 1 0
Preview
NIH reports on ESI support in FY2025 I will be honest, I am somewhat amazed we are getting any funding data for FY2025 out of NIH. The databook has not yet been updated, so we’re not out of the woods yet. Still, there’s a …

Today in "everybody is firmly convinced that they and their type of science is at particular and specific disadvantage at the NIH no matter any evidence to the contrary"....

drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2026/02/22/n...

1 month ago 15 2 2 1

All of us

2 months ago 2 0 1 0
Screenshot from an NIH website reading: "Table 1 shows the number of principal investigators (PIs) applying for or receiving an R01-equivalent grant in FYs 2021 to 2025, disaggregated by career stage. NIH supported 1,423 and 1,144 ESIs in FYs 2024 and 2025, respectively. The decrease seen in FY 2025 may likely be due in part to NIH implementing a requirement to use 50% of its remaining competing Research Project Grant (RPG) funds (starting in June 2025) for full-year funded competing RPGs, which was expected to lead to fewer awards and support fewer researchers overall."

Screenshot from an NIH website reading: "Table 1 shows the number of principal investigators (PIs) applying for or receiving an R01-equivalent grant in FYs 2021 to 2025, disaggregated by career stage. NIH supported 1,423 and 1,144 ESIs in FYs 2024 and 2025, respectively. The decrease seen in FY 2025 may likely be due in part to NIH implementing a requirement to use 50% of its remaining competing Research Project Grant (RPG) funds (starting in June 2025) for full-year funded competing RPGs, which was expected to lead to fewer awards and support fewer researchers overall."

Check this out straight from the NIH website, acknowledging that multiyear funding was likely responsible for a 20% decrease in early stage investigators.

And that it was expected.

A strange approach for someone so committed to the next generation of scientists.

grants.nih.gov/news-events/...

2 months ago 124 59 2 2
Advertisement

Oh yeh didn't think about doing that.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

Don't you lose the official signature when you do that?

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

Yeh i actually kind of like it, but I wish we had the ability to make basic text edits (i.e. paragraph spacing). That's my only complaint.

2 months ago 2 0 2 0

So it was your fault??

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

They've solved science funding

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

I do think this is the major problem. While some night be able to get a decent package up front, the funding landscape in many of these countries, especially in Europe, is pretty grim and arguably worse than the US right now. It might be a decision one regrets in 5 years.

2 months ago 6 2 1 0

You might not if MYF continues for much longer

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

These are countries with relatively tiny research budgets. It's a lot....for them.

2 months ago 6 1 2 0

Other European countries are doing the same thing and investing a lot of money. Watch this space.

2 months ago 8 1 2 0
Advertisement
Preview
PaperBanana: Automating Academic Illustration for AI Scientists Despite rapid advances in autonomous AI scientists powered by language models, generating publication-ready illustrations remains a labor-intensive bottleneck in the research workflow. To lift this bu...

Well, there goes the entire business model for Biorender.

arxiv.org/abs/2601.23265

2 months ago 10 1 2 2

NIDA: 0

NIAAA: 0

2 months ago 1 1 0 0

The NIDDK has still only issued a total of 3 new R01s since October 1.

2 months ago 2 3 1 0

"no more multi-year funding"

What am I missing?

2 months ago 3 0 2 0

This is not true. MYF is capped at FY25 levels, where 39% of all awards were MYF.

We need to be very precise about this because the impact is enormous.

2 months ago 25 9 2 0

Solution? Hire more administrators.

See how this works?

2 months ago 4 0 0 0

I just added the link as a separate contributions section. Not sure if that's allowed or not, but screw it.

2 months ago 1 0 0 0