oh god, it was so, so bad. right up until sweet merciful @dethveggie.bsky.social turned it tf off.
Posts by Micah Schaffer
oh no! 😥
Viacom case wasn't really forgiveness though. It was vindication- we won it on summary judgement no less!
Pretty cool starter pack
go.bsky.app/3urfrLt
can we bring back Fucked Company too?
Nothing says "definitely old enough to be drinking" than makeshift krazy straws!
oh wow, I remember this. I don't think I was 21 yet, maybe I hid in @dethveggie.bsky.social's pocket or something.
And also release the hostages, right? Is eliminating Hamas implicit in your wish for safety for Jews? If so, it would be helpful to make that clear, because Hamas is explicitly opposed to that outcome.
Well done, California. This new law lets Californians force every data broker to delete the fruits of their data harvest with one, much needed single click.
#privacy #AIEthics #data
gizmodo.com/governor-new...
RIP
is it even possible to do content moderation *at scale* without vast financial resources though? yes, you can have healthy self-managed online communities without a lot of money, but probably not a Twitter replacement.
baby witches?
cc @eve6.bsky.social
Law enforcement has cracked down on dark web fentanyl for years. But new research found more than 90 Chinese firms selling ingredients to manufacture that deadly opioid on the open web. If those, 90% accepted crypto.
www.wired.com/story/fentanyl-ingredien...
Etsy surrendered to Alibaba sellers long ago, but it’s still weird to me that they aren’t not aggressive, given that it’s sorta their whole thing. Maybe it’s the equivalent of social platforms addicted to spam and fraud revenue.
A little legal realist/ law & tech inside-baseball thread
about what the Gonzalez/Taamneh cases
In my opinion, the narrative arc of these cases is more interesting than what was in the cases or the issues presented by the cases themselves.
Here's what basically happened:
1/
I doubt YouTube will take his bait. But seriously, declaring “war” against a service provider should probably get you kicked off that service, riiiight?
The idea behind strikes and warnings is to allow users to correct their behavior. It assumes good faith. Accounts with deliberate and systematic abuse need to just get terminated.
This was baked into the original policy principles at YouTube (before the growth folks blasted Alex Jones everywhere). Fostering free expression means curtailing chilling effects as well. Or put more simply, “no one wants to post cute cats and babies on the Hitler website.“
sure hmu
I’ve been blocking a bunch of these too. Clearly there’s a lot of rate limiting needed that hasn’t been built yet.
I agree, we need to build in to clients defaults to services that help block / ban nazis. We should track those instances and make it, so clients by default use the block lists. Same with why we should have users opt-in to seeing adult content.
Only just now understanding his handle lol
Not to be confused with the BBS for Jewish kids that I got banned from when I was 12, called ALEPHnet
I’m going to tell my children this is EFnet
@dethveggie.bsky.social does anyone have a backup of Dem0nseed we can port over?
prettttty good
Even just a commitment to remove on platform, run of the mill hate speech would be reassuring at this point.
Just based on their identity? I don’t doubt that they are anti-Nazi, but I assume there was some behavior or speech that got them banned, right? Perhaps it fell under harassment or rudeness? My point is: have they removed polite Nazi hate speech? I hope they would, but there’s no policy, is there?