How do you design data science competitions that yield real breakthroughs in mental health research? New recommendations in peer-reviewed journal Nature Mental Health from researchers at the Child Mind Institute, plus a free checklist for organizers.
@gkiar.bsky.social
@ariannazuanazzi.bsky.social
Posts by Greg Kiar, PhD
(1/18) Now out on BioRxivβΌοΈ Reproducible Brain Charts: An open data resource for mapping brain development and its associations with mental health | doi.org/10.1101/2025...
Funded by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
π Read the full perspective here: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
... For a deeper dive into how embracing variation can advance neuroimaging research.
#SciComm #NeuroscienceResearch
8/8
π§ Overall, we argue for a paradigm shift in neuroimaging research:
Moving beyond mere reproducibility towards replicability, generalizability, and robustness.
7/8
β
Weβve made a checklist that we share through the #NMIND website to help researchers incorporate and report variability analysis in their studies.
This simple tool aims to standardize and encourage these practices.
nmind.org/variability-...
6/8
While there are challenges like increased costs and complexity, these can be mitigated through open science practices and shared resources π€.
The long-term benefits outweigh the initial hurdles. #CollaborativeScience
5/8
π‘ Embracing variation offers several benefits:
It improves transparency, enhances generalizability, reduces the risk of p-hacking, and allows for quantification of result stability.
This leads to more robust scientific findings π¦Ύ. #ReproducibleScience
4/8
π Each of these can significantly impact results, so our perspective is this
As much as possible, we should avoid making these decisions, and instead explore the multiverse-of-methods.
3/8
π οΈ When youβre constructing a study, there are many decisions you make:
What data to use, experts to include, analytic options to explore, tools to use, systems to run on, and perturbations/contrasts to introduce.
2/8
π¨New paper alert!π¨
Does the sheer number of available analysis workflows (and their potential for conflicting results!!) keep you up at night?
Our new ππ½ in Nature Comms explores how embracing this variability may actually improve generalizability of results.
1/8 π§΅
I figure a fitting start to my life on this 'new' app is to share a recent piece I put out in Nature Communications. @natureportfolio.bsky.social
π www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Checkout my ported π§΅ from the-other-site, below π
Seems like a good time to make the move over to #bsky?!
Hi, all! π
You'll mostly find me hanging out and seeing what the rest of you are talking about, with some occasional chiming in to talk about transparency and rigor in computational medicine & neuro research...
(... or sports)