[Je suis un des signataires de la tribune]
Dans la 1re version, Pronote aurait pu être interdit et l'avis du Conseil d'Etat l'a noté à 1/2 mot.

Depuis, les parlementaires ont essayé de se rattraper aux branches mais la définition finale retenue (et sa constitutionalité) est pas encore claire

I must admit that I am a bit tired of researchers condemning its usage by default (obviously, not you 😉). Providing ethical guidelines would be more helpful and would avoid the grey area we are in.

I know so many students using it without any transparency or disclosure to avoid criticism

My practices avoid hallucinations because I provide all the content and only ask the LLM to check grammar and flow.

I know that the crypto community can be suspicious about it but I systematically disclose this usage (even if it is not expected with Grammarly and I do not do anything different)

Somehow, LLMs simply replaced Grammarly in my workflow. Before LLMs, I was using Grammaly premium to check everything (Grammarly already had reformulation suggestions)

When using LLMs in my writing, I stick to one principle: I always provide a complete draft and I work paragraph per paragraph

PhD student in applied crypto here. I do use LLMs in my workflow to polish grammar and writing flow.

What you are saying really resonates with my experience as I am a non-native English speaker. It really helps me have a better flow, especially in my introduction to catch the readers attention