Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Peter Klecha

you mean signing goalie of the future michal postava as a euro FA? i agree, another home run swing by yzerman

5 days ago 1 0 0 0

that’s my motherfucking mayor baybeeee let’s GOOOOOOOO

1 week ago 7 0 0 0

omfg what???

1 week ago 2 0 0 0

artemis live feed is so fucking funny rn

“houston uh what do we do with these usb cables”

“uh just leave them out integrity we will tell you in the morning how to stow them”

“houston how many pee bags should we have?”

amazing stuff

1 week ago 3 0 0 0

accuracy is valuable

2 weeks ago 1 0 1 0

ya i get that. maybe someone could identify some underperforming players without phrasing it in a way that impugns their honor

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

i keep seeing ppl saying stuff about effort, i wish they would name names. i haven’t been able to catch many of the games lately. who’s phoning it in? who’s showing effort?

2 weeks ago 1 0 1 0

the parse you seem not to have can be paraphrased “is earning more money than your kid bad for your dog?”

3 weeks ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

(for me, obv)

3 weeks ago 0 0 1 0

there are definitely two parses

“is it bad for your dog to earn more money than your kid” is structurally ambiguous, two clear readings

3 weeks ago 2 0 1 0

good but a garden-path (at least when written, i think it may be fine in speech, at least for some prosodies)

3 weeks ago 3 0 0 0

so weird that he’s less sharp lately after getting started 27 games in a row including a back-to-back

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0

BAGGER: (spilling my groceries on the floor) Oh God. I'm so sorry. This isn't what I'm supposed to do.

ME: How are you supposed to do it?

MANAGER: She means she was gonna be a fox. In the woods and shit. But something happened and she got stuck.

BAGGER: (crying) Got so stuck.

3 months ago 5847 1639 33 45

do you think you could come up with a way to visualize the scoreboard-watching sadness experienced by red wings fans over the past, say, week

bsky.app/profile/wing...

1 month ago 1 0 1 0

this is like the very first scene in the montage that segues to an apocalyptic landscape

1 month ago 7 1 0 0

i actually think it's lowkey problematic to joke about stabbing caesar bc for some low income senators becoming tyrant is literally the only route out of poverty

1 month ago 1249 185 4 3

you can make branded types in typescript if you want nominative typing

1 month ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

ECMAScript EXTRA-SPECIAL excitement 😉

🚨🚨🚨 IT'S ABOUT TIME! 🚨🚨🚨

Congrats to @ptomato.name on advancing Temporal to Stage 4 at @tc39.es today 🎉

Temporal is the replacement for the JavaScript Date API 👍

1 month ago 115 30 7 8

Exciting things happening in TC39 right now

1 month ago 25 2 0 1

wings’ injury luck regressing to the mean i see

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

1 seems right, 3 seems wrong but understandable. 2 is just silly

1 month ago 2 0 1 0
4-panel comic. (1) [Person with white hat talking to another person.] PERSON 1 with white hat: As Sherlock Holmes said, When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (2) PERSON 2: What about the possibility that you forgot to eliminate a possibility? Or that you eliminated one incorrectly? Both of those remain, too. (3) PERSON 1: You’re being pedantic. It’s just a general rule for deduction. PERSON 2: But it’s a *bad rule*. (4) PERSON 2: How often have you thought, “I can’t find this thing, and I’ve searched the whole house. The only place I haven’t looked is the car, so it *must* be there.” PERSON 2: ...And then it’s never in the car. PERSON 1: *It’s never in the car!*

4-panel comic. (1) [Person with white hat talking to another person.] PERSON 1 with white hat: As Sherlock Holmes said, When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. (2) PERSON 2: What about the possibility that you forgot to eliminate a possibility? Or that you eliminated one incorrectly? Both of those remain, too. (3) PERSON 1: You’re being pedantic. It’s just a general rule for deduction. PERSON 2: But it’s a *bad rule*. (4) PERSON 2: How often have you thought, “I can’t find this thing, and I’ve searched the whole house. The only place I haven’t looked is the car, so it *must* be there.” PERSON 2: ...And then it’s never in the car. PERSON 1: *It’s never in the car!*

Eliminating the Impossible

xkcd.com/3210/

1 month ago 2884 462 39 24

is that you

2 months ago 2 0 1 0

My dumbest sports opinion is that they should do Olympic speed skating on a really long, straight track instead of laps on an oval track

2 months ago 421 11 37 9
Advertisement

one thing that would be cool, when prominent creators turn out to be terrible people, would be if we didn't have to go through this performative dance of insisting that their work was never good in the first place.

2 months ago 3865 921 71 125

eventually chotiner’s god-tier reputation is gonna go to his head (like, it has to, it can’t not) and every additional one of these we get until then is a blessing

2 months ago 2 0 0 0

We need to shut down the word "performative" until we can figure out what the hell is going on. Of course adopting symbols of protest and resistance is performative! Performance is a core strategy for mass movements!! That's why the call them demonstrations!!!

2 months ago 2336 492 16 35

interesting. so iiuc the upper left is all teams that take their time to set up high quality chances, but there could be two kinds of teams in the lower right: those that take their time to set up highly recoverable chances (CAR) and those that just rip it first chance they get?

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

what’s the relationship between shot quality and time-to-reestablish possession? is the theory that carolina et al are specifically prioritizing recoverability over danger in their shots and thus tanking their own shot quality?

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

sounds pretty good! i’m almost tempted to dust off some python projects just so i can check it out

2 months ago 1 0 0 0