And, although I’m not at SABCS this year, why do we not have data on TILS from KN522?!
Posts by Tim Robinson
Not at SABCS, but from afar there has to be some positive biomarkers from a trial where a significant minority don’t seem to benefit (in terms of pathCR at least) from treatment. More work needed!
We have an open #PhD #studentship as part of our "Black Leaders in Cancer" programme at @crukconvergence.bsky.social & @icrlondon.bsky.social. About computational modelling of T-cell evolution in cancer. www.findaphd.com/phds/project... I'm looking forward to meeting prospective students #CRUKfunded
I should also add that regulators have a key role here and there are signs that requirements will change. We need to using prognostic biomarkers (eg path response) and balancing the harm versus benefit of these treatments for both patients and health care systems
The SONIA trial shows the utility of well-designed academic trials. But funding such studies is getting harder and harder. We need to work with industry to design smarter trials that don’t need further costly and lengthy trials to fill gaps www.nature.com/articles/d41... @oncoalert.bsky.social #bcsm
This is potentially very interesting data but follow up is short at this point and would want to see an EFS/OS outcome. Does provide early signal and could be useful for those where steroids are contraindicated or problematic
Same comment as on the other forum!
I really like this paper and remember being impresssed when it was presented. Hats off to the authors!
It’s the best CME there is. Shame you can’t claim the time!
Certainly needs unpicking and hopefully the samples exist to do that. Did the trial contain a cytotoxic back bone? If not, I wonder if this is needed. Seemingly lots of potential but so far a complex story with anti-TIGIT molecules
⏰ Final call!
🧑🔬 Last week to apply for this fantastic opportunity to work with the exceptional @giampazolias.bsky.social at @cruk-mi.bsky.social. #TeamManchester
To apply (deadline 1 Dec 2024):
www.cruk.manchester.ac.uk/recruitment/...
I’m at 2 rejections for what we feel is a practice changing study. One likely ‘out of scope’, 2nd too expensive and not enough evidence of community support (multiple surveys/patient focus groups backing). Hopeful plan c being made today but it is quite exhausting!
Feel your pain. Can feel like a brick wall. But, celebrate your (very obvious) successes and remember you’re doing great and your research will make a difference!
Nice review! I’m sure we will have combination strategies in the clinic on the next few years but must balance efficacy with cost/side effect profiles
I’ll await my invite..
Not attending this year sadly!
Feel free to please add me Mike
Indeed, also not without controversy I think due to AI results but more relevant than ever due to ⬆️ use. However, I’ve seen critiques of the adherence in the trial and ⬆️vaginal oestrogen doses used that are much higher than modern preparations. Always ➕/➖ when discussing with pts
Yep quoting to keep the links!
Reassuring BUT short follow up at this time point
Bravo, great paper. Lots of emerging data for the PD1/TIGIT combo in the lab but data from lung trials has been disappointing. I hope that new strategies, with chemo or ADC backbones, may help circumvent this resistance. We know cytotoxics induce CSCs and it needs exploring
Interesting results, be nice to see these replicated in other eTNBC IO trials. Also to explore links with irAEs
ALSPAC in Bristol?
@ptarantinomd.bsky.social? ☝️
Anecdotally, seeing an awful lot of younger patients with TNBC coming through MDT. Is anyone else seeing this?
Every. Single. Time
I’m excited to see data at #SABCS but I’m also mindful that we are adding more and more to treatments and feel like we’re reaching the point that we need to start trying smarter patient selection to prevent harm @oncoalert.bsky.social #oncsky
✋