*passively perceiving
Posts by ᕲᗩᐺᖻᕲ ᗷᑘᖴᖴᗩᒪᓍ
there's a difference between being actively pushed ("marketed") an image, and possibly perceiving one based on one's experience or trauma.
in what way did his handlers market him as ❝Mild Charlie Kirk❞? in what way did they associate talarico with the white nationalist movement? quotes and articles, please. very curious.
i would not say talarico is ❝equally appealing❞ to white people just because they're both of faith and white.
that's like saying barack obama and tim scott are ❝equally appealing❞ to black people because they're both of faith and black.
neither pair is even close in terms of ideology.
in what ways, ideologically, is talarico akin to charlie kirk?
i like talarico. am i racist?
the onion could not have said it better.
honestly, not seeing the evil in reporting the lines, as prediction markets have even been covered on npr as surprisingly accurate. even financial advisors are now tapping into the prediction market (not placing bets, but analysing where the money is flowing) as a data point in their analysis.
as another poster stated to this image elsewhere:
❝Not Pam Bondi. That is Ingrid Seynhaeve, a Sports Illustrated model from Belgium.❞
let's not be them.
the report is from just after the election in 2016; however, if you read the report, the incident occurred from 1 june to 1 august of 1994.
www.reddit.com/r/PublicFrea...
#iceshooting #minneapolis #fuckice
I think the problem is you had a piece of chicken, a piece of broccoli, and a tortilla for dinner.
this woman never ages, and she never got immunized. coincidence?
yeah, but the odds go in your favour if you gain just five yards and turn that into a thirty-nine yard attempt. if the kick were fifty-plus yards, the kicker 'has to make that kick', but that doesn't make the odds any better.
with 14 seconds left, a timeout in your pocket, and a rookie kicker, why in the world would you not try to get even a few yards more?
#ravens
this feels so french new wave, i'm wracking my brain trying to recall the film.
i love how as we get old, sneezing can pull a muscle that lasts for weeks. and then laughing about how stupid that is can add another week to the recovery.
upon reflection, you're right. it was a quick, thoughtless snipe. i apologise. sincerely. being called a dork did feel kinda okay, tho, if just for nostalgia's sake.
it's tossing out a theory without having any foundation in any sort of facts. it just goes to supposition, supporting the frame of reference of the writer without any insight into the actual events that took place. none.
i mean, why not wait until more is known? your statement only echoes that of trump's horrific first take on truth social.
your byline is spot-on.
100% this. why is no one mentioning wolff's seemingly complicity in having epstein use trump's involvement as leverage, as if he's a sympathiser?!? yeah, i'm creeped out by it!
this guy just ruined my scroll.
by sucking, republicans are actually blowing
by sucking, republicans are actually blowing
let's hope this remains their arrogant take. denial bodes well for the midterms.
simpler times
you are killing it. keep up the good work. rooting for you from the west coast 🌲
under biden despite that failure. both can be true.
btw, you ever talk with someone and you disagree on a point or two? does that make your entire conversation a failure? or does it just mean you disagree on a point or two? biden's term is far from perfect. the genocide continues, and the dems as a party failed us there. yet progress continued ...