I'm the program chair of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium, the flagship conference for the SIG. We saw a dramatic increase in LLM-generated reviews this year. They are bland, redundant, and way too generous / uncritical. I think it's only going to get worse.

That final list of questions feels like you pulled inspiration from UX research. I ask exactly those questions when I'm doing user observation sessions.

SIGCSE 2026 - Recruiting Reviewers! One of the most important aspects of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium is the volunteer reviewers who provide feedback on submissions to the various tracks of the symposium. We need many people to step u...

📣 SIGCSE TS 2026 needs reviewers!

We're looking for 700+ volunteers to review submissions. Whether you're new to academic reviewing or a seasoned expert, we need your expertise! Graduate students are encouraged to apply.

forms.gle/Cj1dqDwLYxQY...

#CSEd #AcademicService #ComputerScience #Education

Yup. (Also, hi!)

I skipped season 2 entirely lol! So thanks for that tidbit. Just went and watched it. Hilarious.

Yo

Meta ending fact-checking program: Zuckerberg Social media giant Meta announced a series of changes to its content moderation policies Tuesday, including the elimination of its fact-checking program, in what CEO Mark Zuckerberg said was an eff…

Zuck announces today that Meta is removing fact-checking from its platforms. Not that FB was ever a sane place, but it increasingly feels like Blue Sky is the only sane social media place left. I wonder what certain people who feel threatened by it will do to try and stop it / silence it?

#CHI2025 paper revision submitted. It's in R2's hands now.

How I log into BlueSky:

While I haven't been active on Twitter since the hostile takeover, I wasn't active on here either. But seeing the surge in activity has me intrigued to give it a real shot.