Are these the words of a reasonable adult about the subject that is being discussed? No, this is a 'presentation'. Besides, she is not well herself.

Things don't matter. Human use of things is what matters. Nobody needs 'things' that humans don't want to have or use.

So... you refuse to come up with ideas of your own, you decided to bullshit me with nincompoop 'excuses'. Very funny. 🙂 Go on...

That isn't a good enough excuse.
Please, come up with ideas of your own next time.

Did you just say that "You cannot step into the same river twice"? What a novel idea, my dear Heraclitus!

Don't tell me that this is not Kushner.

Have you heard about 'runs'? Read Feller.

Brutes beget brutes.

There is a TV show with shouting and reading from Tarantino, and there is that thing... what did they call it... Oh! Real Life!

Not shaking hands with the Communist 'comrades' for sure.

Memento U+2014 !

I don't see the dents left by the pummeling stones... "dilapidated" is a... slight exaggeration.

Let's establish a 'global' religion of 'economics' and pray for 'stability' every day.
Ha-ha-ha! 🙂

I think the protection from other gangs provided by Mossad to these two should be paid more attention first.

I don't trust people, I trust ideas that are (in my personal opinion) trustworthy.

...not the slave-coders that they hire from underdeveloped countries.

'leadership' is the moral abomination of the human race.

Bill Gates forced his father lawyers to invent this language when he was selling the BASIC tape to the Altair dude. And that is exactly why _he_ became a billionaire on software first, not the software (that he bought from multiple people).

The software will not become any better until the moment when the 'AS IS' and 'AS PROVIDED' clause in EULA will be prohibited. Period. If you haven't read them open any Microsoft or whatever EULA and read. Companies selling software or software services have ZERO incentive to change anything.

Nobody will pay for the tokens that 'humans who want to do a good job' could use to make good software. It's the same today. Nothing has changed.

You forgot that _all_ the economics of software holds on 'AS IS' clause of the End User License Agreement (EULA), which nobody will change in the foreseeable future.

Good point. Multi-turn conversations with AI start for real when you begin editing its responses (and 'thoughts') before writing your own.
...and revising any part of this 'multilogue' at any time. And that's what is different about them compared to the discourse between humans.

That is 'effective altruism' in action. 🙂

Do you seriously think that the crude (actually, outright disgusting) AI generated picture of nine women adorns your presentation?

Besides, the same logic applies to your point: nine half-wit slave-coders will not produce software if they are supplied with your gadget, I'm sorry.

Relax, it is a bullshit 'poll' that has nothing in common with the real distribution and even if it would that distribution would not reflect particular opinions on any particular subject.
Read the fine print - it's a story of 'cooking the data' well described in "How to lie with statistics".

I think I can construct them through Bernstein polynomials to any degree of precision.

Karl Menger would weep.

It does not matter how unsuspecting people in the West interpret the writing, I told you what is was, - an attempt to buy personal survival in a country destroyed by a civil war.

Vygotsky wrote about it because otherwise he would be killed by the 'collectivist' Bolsheviks who were attempting to 'create a new man'. It is a pure communist chimera.

No, just kill out 'revolutionary guards' and all of their relatives genocide-style.