Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Avicia

Now would be a great time to reconsider that 46% cut to NASA’s science budget for FY2027.

1 week ago 1840 387 15 10

Woo! Have the best time!!

1 month ago 2 0 0 0

No, totally doesn't seem like you. Although I'm sure someone (other than you) would consider themselves lucky since he is such a cute little guy. 😍

5 months ago 1 0 0 0

It was the Dunning of tymes. It was the Kruger of tymes.

7 months ago 724 155 10 5

The only question left is which hits the US first: a massive terror attack, a massive geopolitical crisis, or a massive public health catastrophe. We're totally unprepared for any of them. We have ceded the mantle of global leadership in exchange for trinkets.

7 months ago 478 146 49 9
Preview
21. United States v. Nixon In July 1974, the Supreme Court effectively cleared the way for the ouster of a sitting President—in a ruling that may have ultimately *bolstered* the presidency as an institution

51 years ago today, President Nixon announced that he would resign the presidency after a unanimous Supreme Court (in an opinion by a Chief Justice he appointed) ordered him to turn over tapes on which, as it turns out, he had implicated himself in the Watergate cover-up.

Those were the days...

8 months ago 747 208 41 22

We human servants have a lot to answer for 😄

8 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement
A large tuxedo cat with an asymmetrical white blaze on her face regards the camera seriously.

A large tuxedo cat with an asymmetrical white blaze on her face regards the camera seriously.

Lilly is always dressed for an occasion!

8 months ago 39 3 1 0
The majority’s contention that I reject “ ‘pure textualism’ [a]s insuf
ficiently pliable to secure the result [I] seek,” ante, at 10, stems from an 
unfortunate misunderstanding of the judicial role. Our interpretative 
task is not to seek our own desired results (whatever they may be).  And, 
indeed, it is precisely because of this solemn duty that, in my view, it is
 imperative that we interpret statutes consistent with all relevant indicia
 of what Congress wanted, as best we can ascertain its intent.  A method
ology that includes consideration of Congress’s aims does exactly that—
 and no more. By contrast, pure textualism’s refusal to try to understand 
the text of a statute in the larger context of what Congress sought to 
achieve turns the interpretive task into a potent weapon for advancing 
judicial policy preferences.  By “finding” answers in ambiguous text, and
 not bothering to consider whether those answers align with other sources 
of statutory meaning, pure textualists can easily disguise their own pref
erences as “textual” inevitabilities.  So, really, far from being “insuffi
ciently pliable,” I think pure textualism is incessantly malleable—that’s
 its primary problem—and, indeed, it is certainly somehow always flexi
ble enough to secure the majority’s desired outcome.

The majority’s contention that I reject “ ‘pure textualism’ [a]s insuf ficiently pliable to secure the result [I] seek,” ante, at 10, stems from an unfortunate misunderstanding of the judicial role. Our interpretative task is not to seek our own desired results (whatever they may be). And, indeed, it is precisely because of this solemn duty that, in my view, it is imperative that we interpret statutes consistent with all relevant indicia of what Congress wanted, as best we can ascertain its intent. A method ology that includes consideration of Congress’s aims does exactly that— and no more. By contrast, pure textualism’s refusal to try to understand the text of a statute in the larger context of what Congress sought to achieve turns the interpretive task into a potent weapon for advancing judicial policy preferences. By “finding” answers in ambiguous text, and not bothering to consider whether those answers align with other sources of statutory meaning, pure textualists can easily disguise their own pref erences as “textual” inevitabilities. So, really, far from being “insuffi ciently pliable,” I think pure textualism is incessantly malleable—that’s its primary problem—and, indeed, it is certainly somehow always flexi ble enough to secure the majority’s desired outcome.

Whoa. Spicy footnote from Justice Jackson, dissenting in the ADA case. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

10 months ago 3018 754 70 127
Post image

Any Medievalists want a copy of the newest edition of Debating #Medieval Europe - The central and later Middle Ages - for... free?

Our DME books serve as an entry point for understanding the distinctive historiography of their periods.

Hit repost and we'll add you to the giveaway 📗👇 #booksky

10 months ago 45 59 4 3

Law enforcement officers should never cover their faces when making arrests or conceal their identities (unless they are working undercover). They work for us. We have a right to know who they are. These face coverings are frightening & unAmerican, as though they're ashamed of what they're doing.

10 months ago 30466 7931 1252 418

Even accepting the premise that AI produces useful writing (which no one should), using AI in education is like using a forklift at the gym. The weights do not actually need to be moved from place to place. That is not the work. The work is what happens within you.

1 year ago 10488 3364 104 268

We’re going to annex Canada and invade Greenland but we can’t request return of an innocent man from El Salvador.

1 year ago 34499 8094 898 354
A pretty tuxedo cat with a white streak on her face lies on a white blanket with a somewhat serious look on her face.

A pretty tuxedo cat with a white streak on her face lies on a white blanket with a somewhat serious look on her face.

My beautiful Lilly hopes you and everyone else has a wonderful weekend.

1 year ago 3 0 0 0

If you accept that non-citizens have no right to due process, you are accepting that citizens have no right to due process. All the government has to do is claim that you are not a citizen; without due process you have no chance to prove the contrary.

1 year ago 27694 10498 325 566
Advertisement

there has never been a past without trans people and there won’t be a future without them either, no matter what. no law can change that. i refuse to allow them to talk about people i love like that.

1 year ago 2266 488 10 7

Word of the day is ‘huff-snuff’ (16th century): a hectoring bully or braggart.

1 year ago 8361 2475 200 187
Preview
U.S. Park Service Strikes Transgender References From Stonewall Website The “T” was removed in references to L.G.B.T.Q.+ on the official site for the Greenwich Village monument, which marks a milestone in the fight for gay rights.

The Stonewall Riots happened because trans people, particularly of color, rose up against state violence. You can’t even begin to tell the story without our trans ancestors and elders. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/n...

1 year ago 2017 791 22 38

I bought my very shy kitty Lilly a banana toy of her own after seeing these pictures of Flower...it arrived today and she LOVES it. 💖

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

It sure does but hurray for going home. (So sorry about the DKA, it is an awful way to feel).

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Acting on Trump's order, federal officials opened up two California dams The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers just opened up two California dams. A spokesperson says the flows are 'controlled' and being coordinated with local officials.

The very first real victims of Trump's EOs on California #water are California farmers and Central Valley congressional districts that reliably vote red.
He's ordered his dam operators to throw away their stored water, just for a photo op and tweet.
www.latimes.com/environment/...

1 year ago 235 113 9 11

📌

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

In the final minutes of It's a Wonderful Life, George Bailey gets to see what the world would look like if it was ruled by a malicious megalomaniac with no empathy and no concern beyond increasing his own personal wealth. Thank goodness that'll never happen.

1 year ago 16410 2303 379 128
Advertisement

There was a school shooting today.

Protect the oligarchy.
School kids?
Thoughts and prayers.

1 year ago 261 56 11 1

"I see you were fond of playing the Devil's Advocate," Saint Peter said.

"Er... The name isn't really..."

"No, I know. 'Devil's Advocate' is a specific job, and that is allowed."

"So I'm good?"

"No, because you weren't doing that specific job, you were just being a dick online."

1 year ago 489 154 6 5

I've both known people having walking pneumonia (including 2 young relatives) and have recently seen several news stories about a rise in cases of walking pneumonia specifically. I don't know about pneumonia cases in general but I am not surprised to hear it.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Black and white tuxedo cat curled up on a heating pad on a carpeted cat tower. She looks a bit dubious of the photographer.

Black and white tuxedo cat curled up on a heating pad on a carpeted cat tower. She looks a bit dubious of the photographer.

1 year ago 12 0 0 0

Yeah, I used quite a few starter packs recently and when I see I have someone in my feed who isn't what I'm looking for, I just unfollow them...part of the price for adding follows quickly is paring them down as needed.

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

I am not logged in and see only abstracts and prompts to log in for access.

1 year ago 0 0 2 0