Combined with everything people don’t know about low opportunity cost energy

Is is not. 😉

Correction: … isn’t and probably never will be meaningfully useful TO YOU.

The point was: NO FIAT. That means: a way to transact with Bitcoin that is not distributed and controlled by governments. If governments decide to get involved, that doesn't change the point.

Looking long term at Bitcoin is a good thing. Well done New Hampshire!

“If I don’t want something than it should be illegal.”
It does not work like that.

💯

perhaps you should investigate why this didn't happen.

If you have to pay taxes in fiat, then yes. But that's not even the point he/she wants to make.

You sat in the wrong rooms. You only understood why it was not useful for you. And that is okay.

This is funny…

* with low salability

There is a big difference in opportunity cost per kilowatt hour generated. If Bitcoin is only profitable with ´low opportunity cost energy’, then a comparison with a country is not valid. Bitcoinminer = ´buyer of last resort’ of energy with low usage.

We do not panic.

Now do the math on opportunity cost.

🫡

Pyramid scheme = centralized. This is not the case with Bitcoin.

China is the way to go?

Lucky it is NOT!

Bas-relief montrant la déesse Athena avec son casque relevé en deuil « Les ignorants vont plutôt considérer l’éducation et la connaissance comme une arnaque qu’ils ont évitée que comme un objectif qu’ils ont raté »

Bonjourrrr

If you only listen to Bitcoin critics, you might think that Bitcoiners are constantly trying to get people to buy Bitcoin

Meanwhile, we're constantly telling people to learn more first, to wait to buy.

Bitcoiners are largely interested in education

If you cannot afford to read into the matter, then stay away from it. But it is sad to see that you think that Bitcoiners are criminals just because they have a different opinion of the value of Bitcoin.

Legal tender = coins or banknotes that must be accepted if offered in payment of a debt.

El Salvador can be put under pressure by the IMF because it facilitates loans to the country. This pressure has led to, among other things, that their citizens no longer having to accept Bitcoin payments as legal tender.

El Salvador cannot erase digital fingerprints.

Why not? Explain.

In Europe you have MICAR. It is highly regulated. If you use crypto to launder money, it does not end well.

It leaves digital fingerprints. You can track the crypto via KYC portals. That is not what you want if you want to launder money.

Using crypto for money laundering is a very bad idea…

US stands alone