Too many people don't care about the logic for which someone comes to their conclusion, rather they just care about the conclusion.

Of course not, which is why you still refuse to state the actual context.

That's an irrelevant comment. Furthermore it assumes a context rather than creates one.

When people are marked safe from the thing, the thing is fact. Like the "storm" is real.

So when you say you're marked safe from being straight, it means you're straight.

The storm happens, straight happens.

I can't tell if this means the person was straight or gay.

Actually this mentality just makes the other group want to punch you more.

I could never be supportive of trans teens and write something like this because ultimately it is supportive of pedophilia, the logic being that the two are comparable. 😬

Eww

@ousmantourazy.bsky.social If you have an attic, store your old shirts in it so the moths always have a fresh meal.

Naa, he meant, "I have the runs".

I could never be influenced by "clout" like this.

No reason to make this a race issue though. Or a Western thing.

"really was".

This is what I've been thinking. All of a sudden everyone acts like Epstein is Mr. Credible.

Does this say more about men or women though?

What concerns me is that people are focused on "illegal" and not so much on "wrong". Maybe include both words.

If Megyn Kelly was saying that some 19 year olds are still kids, then I don't think there would be an uproar, and that's something to think about.

Maybe Megyn felt mature early? Just trying to see where Megyn is coming from because she's not really making sense.

There's a word for everything you have an unfounded visceral negative reaction to.

This is why it's important to think things through a lot.

It will always seem logical that things you don't like are bad simply because vocabulary allows for it.

Make sure you really know why you don't like things.

I don't understand what Megyn Kelly is saying.

If they look younger then how do they pass as older? How does this make sense?

It's literally a word salad.

No, this makes economic sense. When supply goes down demand goes up and the price goes up.

I also think it's just a culture thing that Epstein created.

Like, I don't think most people were craving underage girls, rather he implanted it in the culture and then you were incriminated even if you did nothing.

This is fine but I also feel like people who aren't Christians don't really care so much about the raping of young girls, rather they use the topic to go after Christians.

If you care about the raping of young girls, then make THAT the issue, not Christianity.

This is because Republicans are not running public nazis for office.

If there were very far right publicly Nazi politicians in power they would discipline Republicans too. Closest thing is Rand Paul, though I don't know that he's a public Nazi, just that he'll go against Republicans in a principled way.

I think human nature is human nature whether dem or rep.

But if he thought he was the best person he ever met, it would look much worse, right?

This is the problem I have with this bandwagon right now.

I'm a contrarian at heart.

So the thing is, if a very bad person says you're bad, does that make you bad or good?

If a known jerk didn't like you, wouldn't this make you look good?

I try to look at everything objectively, and this includes Epstein/Trump stuff.

It seems that when convenient for Democrats or Republicans, that Epstein and Gislaine have credibility.

But when it's inconvenient for them, they have no credibility.

This is why the Epstein files are meaningless.

The narrative is that it's a nothing burger.

I'm on the fence about it all. I think everything will work out eventually. I like how Dems try new things. I like how Reps get their goalposts socially moved but keep everything more or less socially reasonable.

My parents watched Fox News so it's comforting to me lol