Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Christopher Berry

The NhRP has filed a first-of-its-kind lawsuit on behalf of approximately 2,000 beagles and puppies subjected to routine cruelty and mistreatment at Ridglan Farms in Wisconsin, seeking recognition of their right to be free from cruelty.

2 months ago 8 2 0 0
Preview
Animal rights group sues Ridglan Farms, seeking legal rights for beagles An animal rights group filed a lawsuit against Ridglan Farms seeking habeas corpus protections for beagles, arguing their confinement violates animal cruelty laws.

Animal rights group sues #Ridglan Farms, seeking legal rights for beagles.
#USA #AnimalRights #EndAnimalTesting #justice
www.fox6now.com/news/animal-...

2 months ago 2 1 1 0

Was a pleasure chatting with @marisul.bsky.social on @ourhenhouse.org Animal Law Podcast. Highlight for me was learning that someone has taken up intrinsic valuation as their pet animal law cause because I’ve never read a good explanation why this doesn’t fill the companion animal valuation gap.

7 months ago 4 1 0 0

Thanks for having me! Excellent editorial judgment on the quotes you pulled for the promos.

7 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Thank you Kristen Stilt @harvardanimallaw.bsky.social‬, ‪@animal-justice.bsky.social,‬ @climatedefense.bsky.social‬, animal law scholars,
‪@nonhumanrights.bsky.social,‬ @ccrjustice.org @aclu-norcal.bsky.social, @nlgnews.bsky.social docs.google.com/document/d/1...

8 months ago 16 9 0 1
Preview
NhRP to California court: animal suffering matters under the law This week the Nonhuman Rights Project filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief asking California’s First District Court…

Read more about the Nonhuman Rights Project’s involvement at www.nonhumanrights.org/blog/califor...

5/5

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

But, as we argue, ensuring the common law’s just and rational development is a core responsibility of thecourts. In the words of the California Supreme Court: “Courts [must] remain alert to their obligation and opportunity to change the common law when reason and equity demand it.” 

4/

8 months ago 1 0 1 0

Also at stake in this appeal is the critically important question: who decides whether animals matter? The prosecution is arguing that only the legislature can expand the necessity defense to prevent animal cruelty.

/3

8 months ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

The legal principle at stake transcends any single case. It goes to the heart of how our legal system views animals. Are they “things” or are they beings who matter? 

/2

8 months ago 1 0 1 0

On its surface, this case involving chickens, ducks, & criminal trespass may seem far from the @nonhumanrights.bsky.social’s ordinary work. But when a court categorically excludes animals from a legal doctrine that protects against significant evil, it sets a dangerous precedent for all animals. 1/

8 months ago 5 6 1 0

SCOTUS says equity ‘moulds each decree to necessities of the case’ then limits equitable relief to whatever a pre-1789 case happened to use? Should’ve been abuse of discretion review w/ weights on the scale for ahistorical nature. Not a hard crop. #UniversalInjunctions #legalnews

9 months ago 0 0 0 0

(For anybody looking for the opinion you can find it here: Deblase v. Hill, 2025 WL 1696814, Supreme Court of New York for Kings County, Index No. 522689/2023 (June 17, 2025))

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

Today’s recognition by the NY Supreme Court for Kings County that Duke was a family member shows the justice system at its best: fulfilling its fundamental duty to deliver justice based on facts and reason rather than an antiquated legal fiction that animals are mere things.

🧵/🧵

10 months ago 3 0 1 0
Post image

Companion animal familial status shares a deep conceptual synergy with the NhRP's habeas corpus cases because both depend on the same legal principles: "the evolving legal status of nonhuman animals, the role and duty of common law courts, and the fundamental demands of justice[.]"

/6

10 months ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

The Court thus found that Duke was a member of the family under the circumstances: "This Court believes that 'a pet such as a dog is not just a thing' and [Plaintiff] 'is entitled to damages beyond the market value' of Duke[.]" (citations omitted)

/5

nonhumanrights.org/wp-content/u...

10 months ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

The Court agreed on framework: "Ultimately, if a trial court perceives a change in law, it is morally obligated to recognize it" and must "interpre[t] and appl[y] law to align with evolving societal norms while remaining faithful to the original intent."

/4

www.nonhumanrights.org/wp-content/u...

10 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

The Nonhuman Rights Project authored two amicus briefs arguing that courts are not just able to evolve common law to do justice, but have a responsibility to do so.

3/

www.nonhumanrights.org/wp-content/u...

10 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

The facts alleged: Plaintiff was walking the family dog, Duke, when driver ran a stop sign hitting and killing Duke in front of plaintiff who narrowly escaped danger herself. Plaintiff sought emotional damages. Driver argued dogs are just property. Court sought amicus briefing to resolve.

2/

10 months ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Nonhuman Rights Project Applauds New York Court Decision Recognizing Dogs As Family Members The Nonhuman Rights Project celebrates Justice Aaron Maslow recognizing dogs can legally be considered family members in New York.

NY court recognizes dog as "immediate family member" in case where @nonhumanrights.bsky.social filed amicus briefs. First time in NY that witnessing a pet's death can support emotional distress damages. ⚖️🐾

#animallaw #legalnews #legal #animalrights #dogs

🧵/

www.nonhumanrights.org/blog/dog-fam...

10 months ago 6 3 1 0
Preview
Cocaine hippos, monkey copyrights, and a horse named justice: The debate over animal personhood Are human courts the best venue to protect wild animals?

NhRP Executive Director @chrandberry.bsky.social was interviewed for @reason.com on the topic of #AnimalPersonhood: “courts are trying to police a boundary between humans and animals and not recognizing that things don't always fall into a neat dichotomy." Read in full➡️📰 reason.com/2025/05/24/w...

10 months ago 9 3 0 0

Can’t believe we missed the April Fools press release that penguins have a right to be free from tariffs by one day.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Thank you for the suggestions! Added @animallawyersuk.bsky.social, @evabernetkempers.bsky.social, @charlotteblattner.bsky.social, @joyfulgrowth.bsky.social, @dorfonlaw.bsky.social, @drjoshdoeslaw.bsky.social, @valerygiroux.bsky.social

⚖️❤️

1 year ago 4 0 0 0

Adding animal law superstars @njacewicz.bsky.social, @raffaelfasel.bsky.social, and @animalrightslaw.bsky.social

✨🐂⚖️

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Well said.

1 year ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

A Wisconsin judge has appointed a special prosecutor to investigate & potentially prosecute criminal #animalcruelty at Ridglan Farms, one of the last 2 remaining large US breeders of dogs for animal experimentation. One more nail in the coffin of dog experimentation! docs.google.com/document/d/1...

1 year ago 22 10 1 3

Prosecutors often treat commercial animal operations as above the law, even in the face of egregiously unlawful cruelty. It's a huge victory to have convinced a court that this dog experiment breeder should be investigated by a special prosecutor!

1 year ago 3 1 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Building a more just world for all. Make an end-of-year gift to the Nonhuman Rights Project to help power our unique fight for legal rights for nonhuman animals in 2025 and beyond. Through December 31st, every donation will be matched u...

CO’s highest court heard arguments made by NhRP for right the liberty of 5 elephants held captive in the Cheyenne Mt Zoo.The key issue before the 6 justices is whether CO common law protects an individual’s rt to liberty even if they aren’t human nonhumanrightsproject.donorsupport.co/page/endofye...

1 year ago 1 1 0 0

Does everyone in your community agree on some folk knowledge that isn’t published anywhere? Put it in a paper! It’s a pretty valuable contribution

1 year ago 202 26 24 10

Someone must be coughing up mad amounts of money to the ox tail and beef tallow influencer army

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Who’s the artist 😭

1 year ago 0 0 0 0