Yes, Governor Kathy Hochul (in office since August 2021) has vetoed multiple bills that progressive lawmakers and advocates strongly supported. Here are some notable examples:
Key Progressive Bills Vetoed:
• Non-Compete Ban (2023) — A broad bill that would have banned most non-compete agreements for all workers.
Hochul vetoed it, preferring a narrower version limited to lower-wage workers.
nytimes.com
• Grieving Families Act (multiple times, including 2023-2025) - This would have updated New York's outdated wrongful death law to allow families to recover damages for emotional grief and suffering (not just economic loss).
Hochul vetoed it at least four times, citing concerns about rising insurance and healthcare costs.
• Grieving Families Act (multiple times, including 2023-2025) - This would have updated New York's outdated wrongful death law to allow families to recover damages for emotional grief and suffering (not just economic loss).
Hochul vetoed it at least four times, citing concerns about rising insurance and healthcare costs.
yourbuffalolawyer.com
• Utility Consumer Advocate /
Transparency Bills — Repeated vetoes of legislation aimed at strengthening oversight of utility companies and protecting consumers from high energy bills. syracuse.com
• Other examples include certain child care expansion efforts, FOIL (public records) improvements, and corporate transparency measures that progressives pushed for stronger versions of.
ithacavoice.org.
Hochul has signed many progressive priorities (e.g., some housing protections, gun safety measures, and reproductive rights bills), but she has frequently clashed with the left-leaning legislature on bills she views as fiscally risky, overly broad, or harmful to business interests. She has used her veto pen more aggressively than recent predecessors in several years.
Hochul's endorsement of Zohran Mamdani for NYC mayor in September 2025 came after months of hesitation and was widely viewed as a calculated political move tied to her own 2026 reelection fight.
Why it looks that way:
• Hochul is a moderate/centrist Democrat who had clashed with progressives and the DSA (Mamdani's base) for years — vetoing bills they cared about, dragging her feet on taxing the rich, etc.
• By late 2025, she was facing potential left-wing primary challenges and a tough general election environment. Endorsing the rising democratic socialist star helped her neutralize progressive anger, lock in left-leaning voters, and make herself look more "pragmatic" and unifying.
No offence but I’m not sure why you keep arguing when you can go look up the proof yourself. But here you go and hope it helps clarify things for you. I also included the reason why she finally got around to endorsing Mamdani.