Prof. Robert O'Connell of LSU Physics (1933-2026):
www.lsu.edu/physics/news...
obituaries.theadvocate.com/obituary/rob...
Posts by Mark M. Wilde
wow! that is a big surprise. I am sad to hear that also.
Yes, I have much respect for his scientific contributions.
ok, that is weird.
With conferences like TQC, referees have a batch of n papers to review & they have to pick n/4 or n/5 of them. So often they are making up reasons for rejection & have little time to write the reports. Then there is typically not checking of the reports before they are sent out.
how long are you visiting Ithaca for? (I am here at Cornell)
Congrats!
Wish I could be there! Enjoy
Celebrate with us Quantum's approaching 10 year anniversary in 2026 with the publication of the 2026th paper! Do you know which paper that is?
quantum-journal.org/2026-quantum...
🎉🎉New paper: "Metriq: A Collaborative Platform for Benchmarking Quantum Computers" 🎉🎉
We built an open platform to run the same benchmarks across quantum hardware from IBM, Quantinuum, IQM, Rigetti, IonQ, and OriginQ, then compared them all.
scirate.com/arxiv/2603.0...
thanks for your interest.
I think the group I presented to recorded it and might post it eventually on youtube.
Thanks for your reply. I'll get back soon. Overwhelmed with various tasks at the moment
I really enjoyed the lively discussion! Thanks for the invitation
I was invited by @eliesgf.bsky.social to give an online seminar to @jenseisert.bsky.social's q. machine learning group. I spoke about "Fundamentals of q. Boltzmann machine learning w/ visible & hidden units" arxiv.org/abs/2512.19819. Slides from my talk available here:
zenodo.org/records/1889...
thanks! I got your email and will reply soon. From a first glance, your paper looks interesting
Joint work "Fermi-Dirac thermal measurements: A framework for quantum hypothesis testing and semidefinite optimization" with Nana Liu now online:
arxiv.org/abs/2603.04061
"new quantum machine-learning model, termed Fermi-Dirac machines, consisting of parameterized Fermi-Dirac thermal measurements"
yes, you are really right on this! It is painful to submit work to other venues.
many authors and copyeditors no longer take pride or care in their work. It is just about generating lots of content to fill up a CV, and all of these new journals are cropping up to support this need.
it seems that, nearly every month, a new journal focusing on quantum information & computing gets started. Here is a screenshot of a paper in a new one. They'll be happy to publish your papers without consideration for formatting & most authors won't care enough to check for these problems either.
I gave a seminar yesterday at RMIT University in Melbourne on "Query complexities of quantum channel discrimination and estimation: A unified approach" arxiv.org/abs/2511.10832 , joint work w/ Zixin Huang, @jjmeyer.bsky.social , & Theshani Nuradha
Slides available here:
zenodo.org/records/1871...
congrats!
strong theoretical development for quantum hypothesis testing:
arxiv.org/abs/2601.13970
Nussbaum-Szkola distributions are now useful for asymmetric quantum hypothesis testing, in addition to symmetric quantum hypothesis testing
Joint work "Genuine multipartite Rains entanglement" w/ Hailey Murray, Sagnik Bhattacharya, M. Cerezo @mvscerezo.bsky.social, Liuke Lyu now available on arXiv:
arxiv.org/abs/2601.09590
We establish a genuine multipartite generalization of the famous Rains entanglement measure for bipartite states
List of Reviewers Not to Include:
Anyone who might reject my proposal
🎆As the year ends, I want to remind everyone that our summer school applications are open!
Please apply/encourage your students to apply here:
academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/31108
We also have a handshake link too🤝 :
app.joinhandshake.com/emp/jobs/105...
Shares appreciated!
two lurkers in the back...
I do! Next time we chat please provide me with a structural analysis of Roman aqueducts :)
wow, looks like a nice party! have a good holiday break
that's really terrible. The journals need to do checks for this before sending out papers for peer review
that is true, but this one was particularly bizarre