Like a proof of work, create something cool to share (blog, project, etc) and post to lobster's "guest book". Which is just a single slot (20th down or something) which other people can like to vouch you (after like 10 bumps). As a way to minimize harm, but still allow new people in.
And yeah that's a throwback reference ๐ i do think there is something special with the web-of-trust style of invite but I wish you could impose a different bar than "I know a guy".
I think you're right that it's not a problem per-say but I guess I just would want a global diverse user base for an interesting URL notice board, if you know what I mean.
What are your thoughts about if these create strong echo chambers? Specifically because of the invite system.
Vault and slot
All pre-initialized, hopefully their weighted seeds are distinct enough.
A sword can be wielded by any minor.
But the pen? Lock that shit down.
I'm not going to lie, Zed saying you need to be over 18 to use a TEXT EDITOR because you can collaborate with other _people_ is the funniest thing today.
Can we get age verification on the pencil next? Do lawmakers know what teenagers draw in their sketchbooks?
Is the end goal something like web access control? With small incremental steps?
solidproject.org/TR/wac
I'm currently building a private off-network PDS so I am hoping that they will continue to accept internal URLs that do not resolve. ๐
We've been hard at work on a new website with new guides, better docs, more translations, even our very own blog. We think it looks pretty sharp, too. It's now easier than ever to just build things with AT Protocol.
atproto.com
Reminds me of memento. I wonder if you started your waking period with a summary of what you did in your last waking period, would help or hinder/stifle creativity.
What other tasks do you have on your roll table ๐
Happy 1770000000 #epoch
I think "signature" implies ๐ฆ๐๐๐ข๐ฆ๐, "flagship" implies "key to survival"
Don't get me wrong, I don't like app passwords, but I can at least revoke them.
Do we still not have a way to revoke OAuth sessions in bksy? If I login to a website with OAuth and upon reflection don't trust my experience, am I _worse off_ than if I used an app password?
A reminder as well that you can just plug in a hard drive to that Android device
Ok, I was just getting notified via label that you didn't have more than a 4 hour posting break in the last 24 hours. Which is a bot flag normally but I know you aren't
Do you sleep?
Filling out a banking form that asks for my occupation, and in what I am choosing to consider as a sign of the times, "journalist" is not a selectable option, but "cryptocurrency" is
Devil Wears Prada are you wearing scene. Top cell two ladies asking "IS THAT A..." and bottom cell one lady replying "472GB SQLITE DATABASE? YEAH, IT IS.".
Other devs looking at my Bluesky and ATProto coding projects.
that's a cyber deck I would put in my pocket
I'm sure many people are content with the AI summary at the top answering their question. hallucinations or not. I know personally I do a lot of 0 click searches and I don't always leave unhappy.
Do you need to be a pro user? I've been using Dato for this
And any new buyer of a.su if they open the cctld again, should be considered a new identity once a new cert is issued to that domain.
Or at least migrate from a did:web to a did:plc. Something like the did:web owner at 2025-03-01, as proven by signature of https cert owned at 2025-03-1, has stated that did:web:a.su should be treated as equal to did:plc:deadbeef after 2025-03-01.
I'm not claiming this is a good idea! Just that there I think there _can_ exist a way for did:web users to migrate domains.
b.com serves a.su's identity files (packaged however), signed by the last certificate issued in the public certificate transparency log of a.su.
