Interested in avante garde writing and strange essays? Follow me on substack for joycean explorations of the dictionary, late-stage capitalist readings of Montaigne's essays, and countless poems and strange stories of kidnappings, double identity, and searching!
youtube.com/watch?v=UJtg...
But what if it's a really good school district /s
He was a business man
My Christmas was wild. I went to my single grandpa's apartment and talked about books and how bad Trump is and then I went to my grandmas house (his ex) where my family was and it was like a trump rally lmao. They asked if I'd heard of Jeff Dunham and my uncle made a quip about how he isn't PC
Bought Crispi's Genetic Guide to Finnegans Wake's construction and some Dunbarton Oaks collections of old English legal and medical writings as my Xmas present to myself
Vandals is apt
Excellent! I'm glad you see the use value already for it. Only thing id say is I'm pretty sure the paperback available on Amazon (at least in the USA) is the wrong book. Idk if you have access but there's a pdf here:
archive.org/details/hist...
I almost forgot!
When I get home from work I can post some excerpts from it. It's a bit spendy but well worth. Traces the development of prose in English from old English to the early 19th century
Have you read any of George Saintsbury's work? I've heard Joyce was quite a fan and I quite love History of Prose Rhythm. Some one should really tackle that subject again for modernist novels
It's crazy you write like you've found this crazed illusory world of forms others are in when Debord, Marx, Simmel, Durkheim, Weber, Foucault, Plato, Aristotle, Mills, Losurdo, Nietzsche, Hegel, Anscombe, all said this before you Ina more clear and productive way with genuine solutions. You = hack
Like this is so disingenuous to act like you can deduce the answer to society's problems from an abstraction of history. You can only change the Reason of a culture by changing the underlying conditions. You are so backwards in your approach it is infuriating. Also so ignorant to neuroscience
No you simply don't understand religion or human psychology. You cannot rationalize a person out of an irrationally conceived and held belief. You have to change the underlying circumstances of their existence that turn them to religion. Read about brain development for ten seconds and you'd know
Still doesn't say anything as to the forms of power today nor about the material conditions of the modern believer. You're an antiquated self serving fool
Yet this still does nothing to say of how to escape or what material conditions prevent a class or atheistic consciousness
This is just ignorant posting that doesn't relate to my main point which is the material reasons for accepting religion or sport or media. You really are up your own ass
With no Fassbinder in sight
I even censored myself for you
What is your point exactly? That you don't ducking know anything 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah right. Fuckin Dali lama over here sucking on children's tongues thinks he knows everything
The guy was insulting and denegrating the social tether for billions of people worldwide. You also are an ignorant retard. None of you have any idea how control or breaking control works. Indolent children all of you
My real name is Jack Mehoff
Try not to fuck it up
I'm the troll? I'm defending the OP and majority here. You're a stupid cunt
