They are the same policy mate - HAFF is an investment mechanism. Who do you think they've i vested in.
Posts by Pink & Grey
You're literally boosting a pro-genocide party for policies that have done nothing to address inequality. All sizzle and no sausage.
You don't need to invest in weapons companies and fossil fuels in order to build housing you just build it - we've done it before. HAFF is a scam to throw around big numbers without increasing public housing construction to the level required to address homelessness or cost of housing.
I get that you're willing to trade support for genocide for small policy wins but if none of that tinkering reverses inequality, what is the point of a Labor government?
ALP haven't halted the trend towards an increasingly unequal society, haven't done anything to address corruption in politics, haven't done anything for people on welfare. But they have engaged with arms trading with Israel and are helping US murder people in west asia.
Housing Australia Future Fund is a classic ALP policy. Pretending to do something but making sure it can't work because they are too invested in high house prices. And fixing housing is probably the most important starting point for addressing gender based violence.
But no dental because the mouth is not part of the body or something
I bike 15ks to work by bike. Under 10k would be fine for most and then there are e-bikes. When my kids were little, riding made the pick ups and drop offs a lot easier. Our cities are badly designed but ditching a car for a bike would benefit a lot of people.
Given that all of our military expeditions this century have no moral or legal legitimacy it makes sense that our most decorated soldiers are war criminals.
Imagine this being your political legacy - supporting genocide, neoliberal economics, working for the epstein class, persecuting dissidents and embarrassing promo vids at bunning to pretend you care about the working class. So much to be proud of.
Pretty sure she knew it was happening at the time. @senatorwong may be evil but she isn't stupid.
I know a few people who have made the leap from "israel has a right to defend itself" to "we should be bombing israel" while only consuming pro-israel mainstream media. Even political normies are seeing through the BS.
What pushed you over the line? I know plenty of perennially disappointed ALP supporters that can't quite make the switch.
You're supporting the war criminals who are causing the whole price increase and you want us to clap for chicken feed? How dumb do you think we are?
This article is essentially: there's no evidence that Iran has any connection to the arson attack but we'll use insinuations to make you think there is. This is propaganda not actual journalism.
"Israel Has A Right To Exist" Is Psychopathic Bullshit
They donβt care if the entire middle east is turned into an ocean of fire so long as the Israelis are still dancing to their electronic music in the middle of it.
www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/israel-has...
And of course the only person humanised in Lebanon is a Christian. The ABC will rot your brain and have you thinking all Muslims are terrorists to keep Albanese and his orange overlord happy.
No mention of how many people displaced (over a million) or how many children Israelis are killing and wounding each day and still giving credibility to the lie that the IDF is occupying Lebanon for as long as it takes to make them safe in Israel.
You would also believe Israel is good because they are targeting "regime assets" (code for civilian infrastructure) whereas Iran is bad because they are launching "wave after wave of rockets, some hitting residential areas"
www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03... australian state propaganda service twists itself in knots trying to blame Hezbollah for Israel's violent expansionist project despite Israeli colonial attacks on Lebanon predating Hezbollah by decades. How do these servants of empire sleep at night?
There are different takes across wikipedia. I was thinking of Whilhelm Marr's league of antisemites. What we do know is "semitic" was a language group first (included arabic) and we can thank the race science charlatans of the 19th century for popularising the term as an alternative to Jew hatred.
You should look up the Jew-hating eugenicist who coined the term Antisemitism, he was also much worse than a bad person. And take a breath, I'm not your enemy.
Mate, you've just argued that a word is bad if it was coined by a bad person. I was questioning that logic and you've decided to call me racist. I don't use "zio" but there are more important battles, like fighting racist ideologies with real world power like, idk, maybe zionism.
It is like me (a white Australian) getting upset by someone calling me a coloniser. Sure, it doesn't feel good but the context makes it pretty understandable.
anti-semitism was also coined by a white supremacist who hated jews, by your logic calling someone an antisemite would be using a slur.
Zio/zionism refers to a bigoted belief system. It's not bigotry to call that out, it's the opposite. Whatever words you use.
I think all ALP members and funders are complicit too. As are the affiliated labour orgs. They can take their "change from within" batons and fuck themselves right off
"has been criticised" is propaganda for "attacked by pro-genocidal racists"