Watch for Kamala next week on Nick Fuentes' show.

BREAKING: Kamala Harris is running for President again in 2028.

Al Sharpton: "There was a debate in 107 Days - whether you should talk to Joe Rogan and hard-right media, would you talk to them?"

Kamala Harris: "Yes. I will talk with anyone if it means talking with the American People. I do not believe in gatekeepers."

Kamala Harris: "I think we need to be transactional voters. What compels us to vote is not only our civic duty but honoring the ancestors.

I'm voting because I expect something out of this. If you're gonna get my vote, this is what I expect."

(Now we're getting somewhere.)

They voted for the NDAA. When you call "all the wars" an "NDAA" instead of "literally all the wars" that's how they get away with it.

(All Democrats should vote against every NDAA.)

They voted for the NDAA. When you call "all the wars" an "NDAA" instead of "literally all the wars" that's how they get away with it.

(All Democrats should vote against every NDAA.)

Kamala Harris: "We've gotta have guardrails on what big tech is doing, whether it's social media or AI. We cannot ignore the reality of the many factors that affect our children. If we're sitting around waiting for governments to handle this, we may be waiting a long time."

Anti-AIPAC is prosemitic, AIPAC elected antisemite Donald Trump.

The Israeli national lobby is the biggest enemy of semitic peoples, just as the American government is the biggest enemy of American people.

I am proud to be a Jew against Israel and AIPAC which hate me, you, and all of us.

you can tell it's beltway talk as soon as she gets to "american servicemembers." some consultant cooked up that that resonates and not the, idk, hundreds? thousands? of civilians who are now being killed. democrats are messaging really hard that atrocities are fine, just not the way he's doing them

Kamala Harris, allegedly a Democrat, ran as a Chuck Grassley Republican, while her staff made millions to tell her to do so, thus screwing 95% of the country.

Ergo, you can't blame Democrats for not being enthusiastic about the soft-right Republican candidate vs. the far-right fascist candidate.

- No agriculture policy, not that people are voting entirely on eggs - but you still have to have agriculture policy
- Trade policy was unironically for a return to NAFTA-style pacts but I'm the only one who read the plan
- Did I mention she was going to increase military spending but not troop pay

- A limited education plan after Biden promised full student debt forgiveness
- A very limited childcare policy which primarily applied to wealthy families
- Liz Cheney
- No guarantee of ending wars
- Confusing and ambiguous immigration policy
- As of yet she still hasn't learned from Mamdani

No, in the interest of Israel's money and billionaires, Kamala's campaign staff decided to adopt:

- No Medicare for All
- No wealth taxes
- No housing for all
- No policy on Palestine at all
- No wage guarantees
- No COVID relief at a time when that was still critical
- Literally Mark Cuban

The campaign and DNC - essentially one united arm, her campaign was being run by order of the impotent DNC itself which is still very castrated - told her not to draft Pete Buttigieg because he is gay. (It's in "107 Days.")

That part of the conversation seems to be omitted a lot.

The campaign and DNC - essentially one united arm, her campaign was being run by order of the impotent DNC itself which is still very castrated - told her not to draft Pete Buttigieg because he is gay. (It's in "107 Days.")

That part of the conversation seems to be omitted a lot.

Our thing. She lost because she didn't do our thing. Poll the thing we wanted to do vs. the thing she did. Or just admit you are fine with her losing for Israel because you love Israel.

Damn Kamala, you could have prevented all of this just by walking on stage with a promise to stop funding genocide. Instead you walked on stage with a bunch of Republicans.

It should be called a protogenocide or pregenocide in Iran and Lebanon, because it's a genocide which is still in the incubation phase.

Again with the war of choice nonsense. It's a war of aggression. Illegal in every way. These Democrats + their weasel words who object only to Trump's conduct of the war, not the war itself. It's a signal they'd support Trump's crimes against humanity if only 'he was committing them right way'.

As is, neither can I.

But I could, if I worked for her.

Trust is equivalent to my ability to verify, to paraphrase an old Reagan quote - Carl Sagan, who shares my birthday, popularized ECREE.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - should become the norm in political spheres.

Nah, we're not doing the like it or leave thing. That's MAGA stuff. When we don't like something we change it.

I just really like the color scheme here

Some of them came around. Others still are. Those are the ones with a future. The rest are headed for retirement. We will push them with all of our might to let them know - this is it. Either side with us or retire.

My exact sentiment! This is what hurts the most.

Then she'll lose again by choice. But this time it'll be in the Primary, and whoever adopts ideas like the ones we have will be the winner - if there's an election, that is.

Let's not vote for those who don't personally support us. If they choose to hire people instead of us and adopt positions instead of ours, they've chosen to cut us out.

But it's fine to offer them another chance to reevaluate and change their minds. We're not giving up - we're standing up.

It's not going to happen unless candidates speak about it and hire people who believe in it instead of hiring people who oppose it. Then it happens. Look at New York. They said Zohran Mamdani couldn't happen.

Then it was 1%. Then 20%. Then the Primary. Then the General.

He hired the right people.

Malice is the norm. This country itself is malicious. Everyone has done something bad in the past.

Some people are forgiven more than others and gifted more wealth than others.

She did say some things about it but didn't change policy. And that comes from staff, campaign staff and think tanks and lawyers and surrounding campaign members control that. Almost zero political candidates author their own policies. They hire people like me to do that for them.