Chief Justice’s Wife Made $10M+ as Legal Recruiter: Report At least one of the firms reportedly had a case before Chief Justice Roberts.

The corruption is just stunning.

www.thedailybeast.com/chief-justic...

Have to agree with @parkermolloy.com. You're a fucking moron.

impeach trump
push for repeal of bbb
re-fund every program that trump defunded
subpoena every motherfucker
make it so those assholes can't make a single breath without 20 congressional committees investigating every atom

A real senator would hammer away at an administration that caused 130,000 of their constituents to lose healthcare because they couldn’t afford it. But you hear more from Fetterman and McCormick about affordable bulldozers for Israel than about affordable healthcare for Pennsylvania. Pathetic.

You watch Jon Ossoff speak like this about the actual stakes & then you watch Andy Beshear speak about Funny Words, & the abject poverty of the latter approach to Democratic politics in 2026 is so stark that you don't know whether to laugh or cry about the latter.

Man, when you compare the bravery of every day Minnesotans to the overpaid cops it’s astounding

I think it's a dumb fucking take & counterproductive & I voted for Harris & urged other people to do so, too.

That's complete fucking bullshit. You don't know wtf you're talking about there.

Said as someone who DOES hold his nose & vote for Dems.

A breaking update from @timheidecker.bsky.social.

"lot" not "l0t"

We DID get the ACA, which is a big deal for a l0t of people. (And I'm not one to rah-rah the Democrats uncritically.)

Could be an interesting November if states like *Mississippi* are in play at that point...

PLEASE let this lawsuit get to the discovery stage. (It won’t. But a girl can dream.)

I googled "justice involved population" & the only example in first 5 pages was Beshear. The rest were nonprofits & advocacy organizations.

Stop the presses! Sociologists, academics, counselors, clinicians, nonprofit advocacy organizations use specialized jargon! What a scoop!

Nah. Cynical BS. /2

Okay, for just a moment I'll pretend to think you're debating in good faith:

Find me one example of a Dem running for office using the phrase @govandybeshear.bsky.social is criticizing in a public-facing speech, interview, or statement. /1

Enjoy your gaslighting.

A Well-Aimed Potato: The Klan, Notre Dame, and Today | dansinker.com

From @dansinker.com:

When the Klan came to South Bend, home of Catholic educational Notre Dame University. History to uplift your spirits.

dansinker.com/posts/2026-0...

Yes. I've come to believe that the liberal justices increasingly betray our democracy when they prioritize confidentiality & the collegiality of their private debating club over our right to know.

For ex., the liberal justices surely knew the immunity decisoon was coming but sounded no alarm.

I'm not the only one saying so.

You're gaslighting is ineffective. Many of us are very familiar with this particular Dem playbook.

No, it is absolutely meant as a call-out. It's transparently consultant-workshopped, reactionary centrist BS.

Dear @govandybeshear.bsky.social:

We all see what you're doing. Do you REALLY think there's a *larger* constituency for this BS than the constituency of engaged Dems who find this consultant-workshopped drivel insulting?

If so, you are seriously mistaken.

@juddlegum.bsky.social:

"Only six of the 202 articles covering Kushner’s diplomatic role mentioned his financial conflict of interest with the Saudi government. That means more than 97% of the coverage ignored Kushner’s conflict."

Those thoroughly dead eyes...

Nope. Anyone who goes is deserving of criticism & being shamed.

Nobody has to be there. So if they go, they’re making a statement that they don’t consider our democracy worth taking a stand for. Everyone attending is normalizing fascism.

Here is a thing Andy Beshear could have said instead: "Sure some of our folks use terms like 'justice involves population'. The other side is using terms like 'vermin' and 'illegals'—words that *dehumanize* rather than empathize.

Words that make us see each other as enemies, not a member of a–

Yes, good for Larson. But the leadership is feckless losers. Jeffries is just like Pelosi in that respect—unwilling to assert the need for accountability.

This is the excuse: We can't do anything because the Republicans won't go along with it.

You push articles of impeachment because Trump DESERVES to be impeached. You make the case that heisn't fit to be in office. If Republicans vote it down, that's on them.

There’s a reason Republicans don’t constantly shit on their own voters and that’s because it is an abysmal strategy for winning elections

Not only "never please your base" but actively antagonize & disparge it!

Seemed to me in '24 that the people advising Harris thought the voters they *might* (but didn't) get from foregrounding Liz Cheney—i.e. suburban Nikki Haley Republicans—were a prestige constituency unlike declassé base Dems.

"there is only one majority in this country and that is the working class."