Here's how one team stopped building the wrong things.
A backlog built from a validated decomposition chain is not just better organized — it produces fundamentally different team behavior.
medium.com/@paulcrosby/...
Posts by Paul Crosby Product Manager
Can’t stop stupid. You’ll wind up playing their game. They made themselves look foolish and you don’t need to stand by a fool.
Can’t fix stupid. They don’t want insight and change. They picked a side and will stay with it no matter the outcome.
🌑🌑🌑
I keep hearing Yoda’s voice when I read this 😂
Check point in your journey to product centric. crosbypaul.substack.com/p/the-founda...
#productcentric #productmanagement #producttransformation
Here Is How to Actually Design Your Team Topology — Not Just Read About It crosbypaul.substack.com/p/step-6-her...
#productmanagement #teamtopologies #productcentric
Using Value Streams to design product teams - it's step 6 in the product transformation journey.
#productmanagement #producttransformation #productstrategy
www.linkedin.com/pulse/step-6...
The reality is organizations don’t need to be 100% product centric…here’s where product centric folks get it wrong. substack.com/@crosbypaul/...
The architecture dependency map is something every prodict manager needs. This is why. substack.com/@crosbypaul/...
It started as a product catalog and gree into something so much more powerful. substack.com/@crosbypaul/...
You ve got the product catalog and the architecture dependency map but there is one more thing you need substack.com/@crosbypaul/...
I just can’t even believe this is real…but it’s real.
In 5 years, the competitive difference won't be who has the smartest PMs. Both sides will.
The difference will be who can see their entire product ecosystem and move cohesively within it.
What's the visibility gap in your organization? bit.ly/4qq3egi
We talk about empowering PMs: give them autonomy, trust, decision-making authority.
But we often do this while keeping them blind to their own organization's product landscape.
That's not empowerment. That's empowerment with one hand while constraining with the other.
Thread (5/6)
Novice chess players focus on their piece and immediate threats. Expert chess players see the entire board.
Most PMs are playing chess while only seeing three squares in front of them.
Visibility isn't about control. It's about playing the whole game.
Thread (4/6)
PMs who rebuild something that already exists is operating without full information.
Every missed partnership opportunity = invisible constraint.
Every strategic decision made in isolation = organizational invisibility at work.
Product visibility isn't bureaucracy. It's empowerment.
Thread (3/6)
A mid-level PM was building a customer onboarding feature. One hallway conversation revealed: her organization had already built that same capability 4 different ways across 4 different product lines.
She had no idea. She was optimizing locally while blind to the bigger picture.
Thread (2/6)
Here's a question I rarely hear asked in product management: What information do your product managers actually use to make decisions every day? Not what they theoretically have access to. What they actually use.
The answer reveals everything.
Thread (1/6) bit.ly/4qq3egi #productmanagement
Finished my latest article this morning. "The Hidden Bottleneck Nobody Talks About: Why Your Product Catalog Is Your Roadmap to Transformation". Glad the morning coffee kicked in. Check it out on Medium: medium.com/@paulcrosby/...
When business and technology speak the same language about products:
✓ Portfolio clarity improves ✓ Prioritization gets faster ✓ Resource allocation becomes transparent ✓ Cross-functional collaboration actually works ✓ Cycle times compress
Product alignment is a competitive advantage.
We didn't impose a definition. We co-created one.
Define: 1️⃣ The Product = customer outcome 2️⃣ The Platform = technical systems enabling it 3️⃣ Dependencies = organizational functions required
Simple. Collaborative. Shared.
Portfolio planning went from 2-3 weeks to 1 week. 5/6
The moment that captures it perfectly:
Business: "We need to modernize the Prior Authorization Product."
Technology: "Which of the four backend systems are you talking about?"
Silence.
Business thought: one product. Technology knew: four tightly coupled systems. 4/6
Technology teams saw products as architecture:
"Our products are: XYZ API, rules engine, data warehouse, audit logging infrastructure."
They understood constraints, dependencies, data flows.
But ask them why it matters to customers? No answer. That’s the second half of the problem. 3/6