Advertisement Β· 728 Γ— 90

Posts by Veerle Eijsbroek

5/5 Much gratitude to the whole visualization team and the R package developers πŸ™ Leon Ackermann, @alexgu85.bsky.social, @agnilsson.bsky.social, Clara Wiebel, Adithya Ganesan, @katarinakjell.bsky.social, @handyschwartz.bsky.social & @oscarkjell.bsky.social

8 months ago 2 0 0 0

4/5 The figures are accompanied by step-by-step technical instructions and interpretation guidelines, supporting the use of language visualisations for meaningful data-driven insights ✨ πŸ™Œ

8 months ago 2 0 1 0
Post image Post image

3/5 The tutorial guides you through 4 visualization techniques, from visualizing individual words to overarching topics to complete sentences πŸ’¬

They can be used for both one- and two-dimensional figures, visualizing language in relation to different psychological states πŸ˜„πŸ˜πŸ˜ž

8 months ago 1 0 1 0

2/5 We use the open-source R packages text (www.r-text.org) and topics (www.r-topics.org), designed to streamline language analyses for social sciences. #rtext #rtopics #AI #NLP

8 months ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

1/5 Did you ever wish to make a visualization of language data? πŸ€”

We made an R-based tutorial for social scientists on how to turn language data into visual insights βœ…

Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf...

8 months ago 7 3 1 0

The LEADING reporting guideline is now published in Comprehensive Psychiatry πŸ₯³

See www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Or read the previous summary πŸ‘‡

10 months ago 9 6 0 1

6/6 We hope that the LEADING guideline will support researchers in conducting, reporting, and evaluating research that aims to achieve best-estimate assessments πŸ™Œ

Much gratitude to all inspiring collaborators on this project! πŸ™

2 years ago 4 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

5/6 In previously published studies, 18 to 58% (Mean = 33%) of the standards were not reported 🚨 which shows the need for the guideline.

2 years ago 3 0 1 0

4/6 To tackle this gap, we developed the LEADING guideline including 20 reporting standards related to four groups:

1. Longitudinal design βŒ›
2. Appropriate data ℹ️
3. Evaluation – experts, materials, and procedures 🧐
4. Validity 🎯

2 years ago 2 0 1 0

3/6 However, the quality of these assessments is difficult to evaluate due to poor reporting of the assessment methods πŸ“ πŸ˜•

Referring to an assessment as a best-estimate (and sometimes even as a gold standard) while vaguely reporting the assessment method is alarming 🚨

2 years ago 2 0 1 0

2/6 Accurate assessments, such as for depression, are essential but face many challenges.

Similar assessment methods across medicine, psychiatry, and psychology involve experts reviewing several sources of longitudinal information to achieve best-estimate assessments. ✨

2 years ago 3 0 1 0
Preview
The LEADING Guideline Reporting Standards for Expert Panel, Best-Estimate Diagnosis, and Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD) Studies medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences

1/6πŸ””New research!πŸ””
We developed the LEADING guideline to improve the reporting of best-estimate assessments ✨

With @katarinakjell.bsky.social, @handyschwartz.bsky.social, @jrboehnke.bsky.social, @eikofried.bsky.social, D Klein, P Gustafsson, I Augenstein, P Bossuyt, @oscarkjell.bsky.social

2 years ago 7 2 1 4