It's unfortunate that you lack the ability to conduct a respectful conversation with someone without resorting to ad hominem.

Just like how the liberals hate people who abuse drugs so they encourage the drug use by opening up safe injection sites? It's all a matter of perspective and saying something like "hate" is not a very solid answer.

Bro has actually never seen meme captions before lmfao

Ad hominem lmfao

Ah, so you admit your argument was fallacious and just don’t care? Got it. At least that clears things up.

He's voted for policies such as: tying federal funding to housing targets, selling off federal land for housing development, and easing zoning restrictions to name a few.

Poilievre was the Minister of Employment and Social Development for about nine months in 2015, not a long enough time to overhaul housing policy. Large-scale housing development typically takes years to show results.

That is entirely full of logical fallacies as I have pointed out and is not a proper argument. Btw nice ad hominem (though again you should try something different it's getting stale).

Your statement might have been about campaigns but you did not address the fallacies in your statement.

Btw, congrats on using two new fallacies in that reply (Straw Man and Red Herring)! Though reusing and hominem is a bit lazy, perhaps try incorporating another fallacy instead or perhaps writing an actual valid argument.

Whether campaigns are won through logical arguments or not is irrelevant to whether your statement contained logical fallacies. Instead of addressing that, you've resorted to insults and dodging the issue. If you actually believe your claim is defensible, feel free to back it up with reasoning.

I think the polls are overcompensating a little. Carney at the helm would certainly attract some support, but I still feel there's a lot of fatigue with the Liberal Party. The pendulum has to swing, so to speak.

There are still multiple reasons for why a person would vote conservative such as:
- The Housing Plan
- The Pipeline/Resources Plan
- The Harsher Sentencing Plan
To name a few!

Here are all the logical fallacies in that comment:
-Guilt by Association
-Hasty Generalisation
-Ad Hominem
-False Dilemma
-Begging the Question
-Appeal to Emotion

I don't care if you're a liberal but like, at least try to present a valid argument

No carbon tax

Tbh it was sort of the same for the liberals but yeah this poll is probably a little presumptive

Prove it

Bruh, they most certainly are not

Personally either cons or ndp

That is a gross hasty generalisation

I guess it's also my opinion that the tariffs aren't the most important issue in Canada. I feel like PP is a jack of all trades considering that he's a career politician who has served as a government minister

Yeah I'm not a fan of those endorsements tbh but I hope it ends up being something similar to how trump has endorsed the CDU in Germany even though they're staunchly against him. PP isn't just standing firm though, he's for retaliating with dollar for dollar tariffs

I'll concede that Carney has economics experience but I disagree that PP has been weak against trump. PP has stood pretty firm in his statements against trump. In addition, I feel as though economics experience isn't enough to justify his bid for PM, at least in my opinion

To my knowledge, as far as the 08 recession is concerned, he just upheld historical banking policies, which I guess could be called the right thing to do. I appreciate your reply btw! As far as policies are concerned, I still feel like PP has some good ideas though

Gotta ask, why? I've heard some of Carney's ideas but I don't get what about them makes him the best candidate. I had the intention of voting conservative for the last year so I'm curious what the liberals are offering

Out of curiosity, why? I've been a little out of the loop politically for the last few months and I had the intention of voting conservative so what about Carney makes him the best bet?

big if true

the early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese

three “n”s - it’s undeniable!

horses