For all of Starmer’s talk of putting country before party and civic duty etc etc he is pretty straightforwardly doing harm to the country and governance by choosing to prolong the inevitable
Posts by Richard
Graphic design is my p̶a̶s̶s̶i̶o̶n̶ curse
Yesterday?
Its another long line ofnthisngoverment governing for the voting coalition it wishes it had rather than the one that it does have.
Becasue, I mean she is right, millions of people want a more restrictive immigration
But they vote for reform/tories! The liberals are the ones that out her in office!
I mean in general as a politician I think mentioning the race of members of the public you don't like is probably always a bad idea?
Again, from freebiegate, to Mandleson, to Doyle just a consistent theme of behaviour that would be unacceptable and, frankly, result in a disciplinary in the private sector is just normalised in parliament.
A real, persistent problem for our politics that it is so endemic and normalised.
Its amazing because if she wasn't doing whatever the hell this is, we might have spent this week talking about her as the next leader.
As opposed to her, Reeves and Starmer being the trio that are *definitely* out when the new leader comes in.
Fascinated as to Mahmood's theory of 'how minority politicians succeed in democracies'.
It is amazing to think that these two guys have presumably been having "Madelson is completely unfit for office" conversations for 30 years.
Actually hysterically laughing at this. You get the feeling he's about to turn to Ed balls and said "I always did say he was a bit of a cunt, didn't I?"
Long enough to at least have a plan for higher education?
What evidence, at all, do you have that in 2029 things will be better? The demographics will be worse (thanks to them), the public sector will be crumbling (thanks to them) and there will be tax hikes in an electionnyear (thanks to them).
You are a fanatic, and its really funny that you think you are thinking rationally.
I bet the next guy would not hire Peter Mandelson.
Julia Louis-Dreyfus being in 3 Marvel properties over those 5 years vs his 0 is absolutely mad.
What results of policy? Also, incase you haven't noticed, the straight of Hormuz is still close and we are weeks away from a crisis.
But that would mean actually discussing them, instead of smuggly assuming he holds the one true correct opinion.
Yeah I agree
They were polling at 40 against a guy polling in the 20's who's campaign team were busy making illegal bets and insulting D Day veterans.
I don't think it was ever going to be nail biter.
But then why did you suggest lying about U turns?
I don't its to late for that, I really don't think he is seeing another budget
But if it does happen you will be right.
The government that got elected in America in 2024 put up tarrifs!
Then why did your wise PM argue so hard against it?
I mean, they did raise NI!
Also, I love this circular logic. "Every decision Starmer made was correct, because if it wasn't correct, he would not have made it!"
There are deities with a less supportive fan base.
Which is one of the many stupid political decisions they have made. See also *gestures to every news website innthencountry*.
Well, you might think that, but clearly you don't understand politics as well as this Number 10 operation, with their "is their space for another friend of a pedophile ambassador?" plan.
It was not rational.
What? There was no new news between the 2 child cap being absolutely vital to it being a cruel tory policy. All that changed was Labour MP's saying "We will not be the first Labour government to increase child poverty".
Also I think by definition no rational government would involve so many U turns?