Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Richard

For all of Starmer’s talk of putting country before party and civic duty etc etc he is pretty straightforwardly doing harm to the country and governance by choosing to prolong the inevitable

48 minutes ago 28 3 3 0

Graphic design is my p̶a̶s̶s̶i̶o̶n̶ curse

2 hours ago 45 11 1 0

Yesterday?

2 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Its another long line ofnthisngoverment governing for the voting coalition it wishes it had rather than the one that it does have.

Becasue, I mean she is right, millions of people want a more restrictive immigration

But they vote for reform/tories! The liberals are the ones that out her in office!

3 hours ago 12 0 0 0

I mean in general as a politician I think mentioning the race of members of the public you don't like is probably always a bad idea?

3 hours ago 10 0 1 0

Again, from freebiegate, to Mandleson, to Doyle just a consistent theme of behaviour that would be unacceptable and, frankly, result in a disciplinary in the private sector is just normalised in parliament.

A real, persistent problem for our politics that it is so endemic and normalised.

6 hours ago 103 24 7 0

Its amazing because if she wasn't doing whatever the hell this is, we might have spent this week talking about her as the next leader.

As opposed to her, Reeves and Starmer being the trio that are *definitely* out when the new leader comes in.

3 hours ago 5 0 0 0

Fascinated as to Mahmood's theory of 'how minority politicians succeed in democracies'.

3 hours ago 97 17 11 3

It is amazing to think that these two guys have presumably been having "Madelson is completely unfit for office" conversations for 30 years.

3 hours ago 6 0 0 0

Actually hysterically laughing at this. You get the feeling he's about to turn to Ed balls and said "I always did say he was a bit of a cunt, didn't I?"

3 hours ago 112 26 3 1
Advertisement

Long enough to at least have a plan for higher education?

What evidence, at all, do you have that in 2029 things will be better? The demographics will be worse (thanks to them), the public sector will be crumbling (thanks to them) and there will be tax hikes in an electionnyear (thanks to them).

4 hours ago 2 0 0 0

You are a fanatic, and its really funny that you think you are thinking rationally.

4 hours ago 0 0 0 0

I bet the next guy would not hire Peter Mandelson.

4 hours ago 1 0 1 0
Preview
a man in a suit is standing in a field of grass ALT: a man in a suit is standing in a field of grass

"Are they have fixed education?"

5 hours ago 1 0 1 0

Julia Louis-Dreyfus being in 3 Marvel properties over those 5 years vs his 0 is absolutely mad.

5 hours ago 4 0 0 0

What results of policy? Also, incase you haven't noticed, the straight of Hormuz is still close and we are weeks away from a crisis.

5 hours ago 2 0 1 0

But that would mean actually discussing them, instead of smuggly assuming he holds the one true correct opinion.

5 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Yeah I agree

5 hours ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

They were polling at 40 against a guy polling in the 20's who's campaign team were busy making illegal bets and insulting D Day veterans.

I don't think it was ever going to be nail biter.

5 hours ago 1 0 0 0

But then why did you suggest lying about U turns?

5 hours ago 0 0 0 0

I don't its to late for that, I really don't think he is seeing another budget

But if it does happen you will be right.

5 hours ago 3 0 2 0

The government that got elected in America in 2024 put up tarrifs!

5 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Then why did your wise PM argue so hard against it?

5 hours ago 0 0 0 0

I mean, they did raise NI!

5 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Also, I love this circular logic. "Every decision Starmer made was correct, because if it wasn't correct, he would not have made it!"

There are deities with a less supportive fan base.

5 hours ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement

Which is one of the many stupid political decisions they have made. See also *gestures to every news website innthencountry*.

5 hours ago 2 0 0 0

Well, you might think that, but clearly you don't understand politics as well as this Number 10 operation, with their "is their space for another friend of a pedophile ambassador?" plan.

5 hours ago 3 0 0 0

It was not rational.

5 hours ago 1 0 1 0

What? There was no new news between the 2 child cap being absolutely vital to it being a cruel tory policy. All that changed was Labour MP's saying "We will not be the first Labour government to increase child poverty".

5 hours ago 4 0 2 0

Also I think by definition no rational government would involve so many U turns?

5 hours ago 5 0 1 0