Over the past 25 years, the average customer has not booked with them again.

Science happiness is the best happiness

Reliable research in the social and behavioural and sciences Sweeping new investigations probe the replication, robustness and reproducibility of results across the behavioural and social sciences.

A new set of papers, sharing the long-awaited result of several reproducibility and replicability projects, including commentaries, is published today. I look forward to reading the studies, and re-using the data generated! www.nature.com/collections/...

Wow!!

I swear I’m not trying to be annoying, but I’d call this 12/8.

Alleen is deze foto helaas AI-gegenereerd. Maar vanaf de grond zag het er goed uit hier in Philadelphia.

Pumpkin on a stick, wearing a mop as hair, with a crown on top.

I also liked whatever this is.

Of course!

@jurygirl.bsky.social - I will send it to you!

A woman on a podium amid speech in front of an audience of men and women

It was a pleasure to have @edithbeerdsen.bsky.social present her timely and important article, Expert Evidence in Times of Skepticism & Distrust (forthcoming @michlawreview.bsky.social), at today’s @setonhalllaw.bsky.social faculty workshop, sparking an invigorating discussion 🔥🔥🔥

Thank you so much, @dorfmandoron.bsky.social, for hosting me, and to the whole faculty for all the thoughtful comments. This was a great discussion.

This is not just a win, and not even just a win that will improve many people's lives. It is also proof of concept of a form of scholarship that Rachel pioneered. (Make sure to read the whole thread.)

Why is coming up with an idea and having an AI work it into a full article better than publishing the idea only? That way every reader can decide for himself whether to read the idea as is or to prompt an AI for a blog version, podcast version, law-review version, essay version, ELI5 version, etc.

It's also an open debate whether blind is better than unblind. There are real pros and real cons for both. Blind peer review can sink good work because of petty opinions, dogmatism, jealousy, etc. In unblinded review, people will at least take a beat to think before saying anything unfair.

A platform with a price of admission: for every paper you submit you are required to peer-review three others. Every journal on the platform has access to all the peer reviews. Ideally fully unblinded.

Congratulations! Looks like an interesting paper!

I am thrilled that my latest article, The Dirty Work of Executioners is forthcoming in the UC Irvine Law Review! The acknowledgment footnote here is long—so many people encouraged and inspired me, and asked me hard questions that made my work better. Draft coming soon to SSRN…

The other day, a friend sent a five-line text (about 50 words). An AI bubble popped up to ask if I wanted the text summarized. Who asked for this?

This is only half on-topic, but does anyone know why law reviews tend to be coy about how many submissions they receive? It's rare to find an editor who's willing to say whether it's 2,000 or 4,000 or what. Is there an upside to treating the number as a state secret?

very aspect of life in this country is designed so that people do not form bonds or relationships with other people, it's wild to watch in action. Never seen divide and conquer applied this rigorously to a domestic population that is not under foreign occupation

Excited to share two projects, forthcoming in the Minnesota Law Review and the Notre Dame Law Review, about federal courts’ increasing reliance on “external” factfinding of epistemically dubious provenance. (1/4)

Congratulations! Looks like 2027 will be the year of reading all my friends' books :) Seriously, though, this sounds incredible and I look forward to reading it.

Wow, these looks fascinating and I look forward to reading them! Was this the proverbial paper that turned out to be two papers? Congrats on two great placements!

Happy to share that Developmental Evidence Rules is forthcoming in the California Law Review! What would it mean to take childhood seriously in evidence law? This article takes up that question.

Well, strike that - this issue seems to be fixed! Thank you, @ssrn.bsky.social.

I've been wondering if the Google Scholar issue has to do with the missing metadata on SSRN's end. SSRN no longer shows where a paper is published, so what is Google supposed to do with that? @ssrn.bsky.social, any update on whether/when it's going to be fixed?

Great photo! Stay warm.

Judicial meekness? Judicial apathy?

Working on Restoring Justice kept me grounded this past year, so I share it w/ excitement & some nervousness.

Written w/ Meredith Elizalde, whose son Nick was killed in a shooting at his high school, we argue for a right to restorative justice.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Thank you! This was such a diverse and multi-interested crowd. I really enjoyed your talk, too. What a great conference.