any person who is going to notice will already have done so... we're essentially being asked to follow a law that requires us to make it look like we're breaking it.

TheHumanistVoice

@humanistreport.bsky.social
Hey, I found this channel just now and it looks like they've been stealing your content
www.youtube.com/@TheHumanist...

simple really, we just stop saying the word "cis" and they'll all suddenly not be aware of cis ideology and desire transition... thats how this works right?

When people ask "what right don't trans people have?" they're starting from the assumption that human rights for trans people don't actually count as "rights" because they don't see trans people as real... so nothing you can say will be considered a proper answer for them

I've been feeling like AI has become the new "God told me". Just an excuse to do heinous things while vaguely alluding to some mysterious higher power

Exactly what I was thinking

playing this in January and I loved it

I just find it so strange how "short hair" is being used as a signifier of trans women as if trans women are a demographic where short hair is prevalent... do they think that hair legnth is determined by chromosomes or something?

if its something that only applies to trans criminals and not cis criminals, then what the punishement is dealt specifically for being trans

They never seem to realise that projecting boyhood onto us only causes us to unknowlingly reflect our own girlhood onto boys... it's like "well everyone says I'm a boy, so everything I'm experiencing about despertaely wanting to be a girl? well that must just be what boys experience!"

yup, that's exactly it

"we care about trans people's wellbeing, but they should be banned from toilets"

well, I guess if it's *clear* that they view us as sub-human, then we shouldn't complain because their disdain for us is *clear*... what a joke

By the way, was that Posie Parker/KJK saying (paraphrasing) "it means their brain must be different but that makes no sense and is actually more like a religion"?

Yeah but that's all just labels, there is nothing that they know about any given trans person that is simultaneously true and also not known by the trans person themselves

Oh yes I do remember that one

I've always said that they never give any details about what we're supposedly delusional *about*

they truly don't believe we exist so they have to invent stories to account for all the ways we act as though we do

I am not familiar with that old post but I'd love to see it if you have a link/screenshot

Spot on!

They could literally offer me a billion pounds to detransition and I'd turn it down in a heartbeat... they're never going to make transition "not worth it"

Sometimes I see somebody post something and I get an overwhelming surge of triumph because of how correct it is

it's because they don't actually believe trans people are real... and so they think that if they just apply enough pressure then that'll make us all stop "doing the trans things" and act in our "natural" cis-beign selves. They ultimately don't think any of it matters, so they're shocked that we care

Women entering the space designated for women is not "taking over"

Looking at Twitter, checking in on the enemy. Many of the "gender criticals" apparently assumed that the Supreme Court ruling would be some sort of final victory. That, I don't know... trans people would stop fighting and quietly go away? They seem rather demoralised that this didn't happen.

How good is that for us? I mean I get that it's good that she showed some incompetance and all that but how much do you think that will work in our favour?

Immediately

it's nto about "biological advantages" it's about cis suppremacy... if a trans person wins then it's "unfair" because it means a human was denied a victory to a non-human... that's what it's really about

if trans women are "the average man" then we have to assume that "the average man" is a trans woman... and base all healthcare/proceedures for cis men based on what benefits trans women. They cannot (from a logic perspective) have it both ways

Imagine if somebody advocated for all cis people to be forced to transition on the basis that they had found two cis people who did a bad thing