A high-fidelity infographic illustrating the conflict between a university's internal technology ecosystem and a vendor's external toolset. On the left, rooted in a university building illustration, blue branching lines connect "University Internal Toolset" components, including Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), CRM, Governance Process Tools, and Internal Project Management Systems. On the right, stemming from cloud icons, rigid grey lines connect "Third-Party Vendor Toolset" components, such as Standardized Playbooks, Vendor Project Management Platforms, and Mandated Communication Portals. In the center, large arrows from both sides collide in a jagged red explosion labeled "Consternation & Harmonization Challenges," surrounded by warning triangles. Below the collision, a central box with a broken chain icon reads "The Clash: Duplication of Effort & Fragmented Workflows," surrounded by smaller bubbles detailing consequences like "Double Entry of Tasks," "Communication Silos," "Data Integration Hurdles," and "Administrative Burden Increase."
Vendor tool vs. Internal tool. 🛠️ Who should adapt? A new @educause.bsky.social article outlines 4 strategies to manage the "clash" of project management systems. Hint: If you wait until the kickoff meeting to decide, it's already too late. 📉
er.educause.edu/articles/202...