Posts by Bernard Andrews
Oh that's very interesting!
The phrase ‘learning is invisible’ is a lazy and sloppy cliche which we should probably stop using.
open.substack.com/pub/bernarda...
...but I really should read more V. I think there's a lot of overlap. Looking at what he said about patterns and tools of thinking, for example.
That's interesting. I wonder whether the difference between a Wittgensteinian and a Vyvotskian approach is that W might refer to context and ask 'what is it that we call "learning"?' whereas V might say 'what is it that causes
"Learning"?' ...
Warum "Lernen ist unsichtbar" eine beliebte, aber an sich wenig sinnvolle Phrase ist. @bernardandrews.bsky.social
#Lernen 👇
Yes that's exactly the view I'm arguing against in the post.
"Others might bring up that abomination of a sentence, ‘learning is change in long-term memory’, which just ignores most of the ways in which we use the word..."
I enjoyed this very thorough exploration of the visibility of learning, from @bernardandrews.bsky.social
This is very interesting indeed. Unfortunately I think the idea that learning can only be made 'visible' by testing a learner's memory has got embedded in our education and accountability systems.
The phrase ‘learning is invisible’ is a lazy and sloppy cliche which we should probably stop using.
open.substack.com/pub/bernarda...
New post!
● Does "checking for listening really help learning"?
Please share 🙏
christianmooreanderson.com/does-checkin...
New post!
● Teaching tricks, fidelity, and the illusion of "best bets"
#UKEd #EduSky
christianmooreanderson.com/teaching-tri...
Evan Thompson on how "controlled hallucination" and "Predictive Processing" are wrong.
@musingsofadr.bsky.social @mrbates.bsky.social @adamwteach.bsky.social @bernardandrews.bsky.social
Thanks James!
This is such an important perspective, which is so often missing from discussions of "what works" in education. From @bernardandrews.bsky.social
bernardandrews.substack.com/p/efficiency...
This is an important and good interview, regardless of one's opinions on what the prof says.
"I’ve been quite swept up by the autism spectrum idea, and it’s only in the past 10 years or so that I have felt things have gone too far, and very slowly I have come to say, 'No, this is not right'"
Autism expert professor Uta Frith talks to @helen-amass.bsky.social
www.tes.com/magazine/tea...
The most important part of the White Paper will be *how* decisions are going to be made about which support is effective and who should get it. In the end, that’s the crux of any SEND reform.
The other day, @agittner.bsky.social prompted me to describe how I would teach a concept.
I found it almost impossible.
And, it had me wondering why, a full time biology teacher, head of biology, & someone who has written so much on biology education, couldn't do it easily.
Here's my answer 🧵
Yes, I can see that. I was discussing Simone Weil's view of education with @bennewmark.bsky.social recently and that's basically the method she suggests for learning. Being patient and humble enough to simply reject the wrong answer.
A tough but incredibly rewarding book for me is Maturana's The Origin of Humanness in the Biology of Love.
It paints a very different picture from this. Humans are a loving species who get physically ill when deprived of it.
I declare this book finished.
It's been intense. So much editing. This is the most important work I've written.
As far as I'm aware, the first book for general teachers that's deeply rooted in *enactive* cognitive science.
Teaching Meaning: What Works When Telling Isn't Enough
Out soon!
Thank you!
Bei @bernardandrews.bsky.social gibt es immer Interessantes zu lesen. Ein "Bookmark" für seine Seite wäre meine Empfehlung:
bernardandrews.substack.com
Und ja, Bildung braucht die Philosophie ganz dringend.
bernardandrews.substack.com/p/predictive...
Beide Artikel zeigen, inwiefern die "Cognitive Sciences" einem Szientismus verfallen, wenn sie meinen, die Grenzen ihres Gegenstandes überschreiten zu müssen (etwas vereinfacht gesagt...). 2/2
Interessanter Artikel von @bernardandrews.bsky.social zum Problem mit Modellen wie "Predicitve Processing", der auf einem anderen Artiekl aufbau, nämlich... 1/2