Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Dennis Crouch - Patently-O

The DTSA's Missing Preemption: Does § 1835(b) Bind State Courts? A new cert petition asks whether the DTSA's trade secret confidentiality protections in 18 U.S.C. § 1835(b) bind state courts. The answer is far from clear.

New on Patently-O: Does the DTSA's trade secret protections bind state courts? A cert petition challenges whether § 1835(b) applies beyond federal proceedings. The answer remains surprisingly uncertain.

4 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Barry v. DePuy Returns: En Banc Petition Tests EcoFactor's Reach on Rule 702 Gatekeeping DePuy's en banc petition in Barry v. DePuy Synthes argues the panel reintroduced the weight-not-admissibility framework that EcoFactor and the 2023 Rule 702 amendments rejected.

Barry v. DePuy heads back to the Federal Circuit en banc. DePuy challenges a panel decision on expert witness admissibility, arguing it conflicts with EcoFactor and recent Rule 702 reforms. New analysis on Patently-O.

14 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Same Problem, Same Solution: Reading Trade Secrets Across Fields Federal Circuit reverses $17M Penuma judgment, tightening California's 'generally known' trade secret rule and tying it to patent inventorship.

Federal Circuit just tightened California's trade secret rules in a major reversal of a $17M Penuma judgment. The court tied "generally known" standards to patent inventorship - a significant shift. Read the full analysis on Patently-O.

3 days ago 1 0 0 0
Extra Credit, Not Required: Teva v. Lilly and the Limits of Amgen's Reach Federal Circuit reverses JMOL in Teva v. Lilly, holding that method-of-use claims face a lower Section 112 bar when the genus is well known and not itself the invention.

Federal Circuit limits Amgen's reach in Teva v. Lilly: method-of-use claims face a lower Section 112 bar when the genus is well-known. A key win for patent applicants. Read the analysis on Patently-O.

4 days ago 3 0 0 0
Extraordinary by Design: How the USPTO Is Bypassing Its Own Reexamination Rules USPTO's new pre-order procedure lets patent owners oppose ex parte reexamination before the SNQ determination, but the legal basis is shaky.

The USPTO is breaking its own reexamination rules. New pre-order procedures let patent owners challenge ex parte reexamination before SNQ determination - but is there legal authority? Read the analysis on Patently-O.

5 days ago 5 2 0 0
Preview
Mind the Gap: The Middle Layer of Obviousness Doctrine Graham's four factors organize the evidence but don't resolve obviousness. The doctrines built atop them do the real analytical work.

Graham's four factors provide the framework, but they don't seal the deal on obviousness. Discover how the doctrines built on top of them do the real analytical work in our latest Patently-O analysis.

6 days ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
PTAB Inventory Drops Below 2,000 for the First Time in 20 Years PTAB inventory drops below 2,000 for the first time as appeal pendency falls to 9 months and IPR institutions decline 43% under Dir. Squires.

Breaking: PTAB inventory drops below 2,000 for the first time in 20 years. Appeal pendency falls to 9 months as IPR institutions decline 43% under Director Squires. A major shift in patent litigation landscape. Read the analysis on Patently-O.

1 week ago 2 0 0 0

Stay ahead in patent law. Patently-O premium gives you full access to expert analysis, breaking news, and in-depth commentary. Subscribe today and never miss critical insights. https://patentlyo.com/login-2

1 week ago 0 0 0 0
Marked for Trouble: Settlement Licenses and the § 287 Trap for NPEs Federal Circuit panel hammers NPE counsel on whether settlement licenses trigger the § 287 marking requirement for pre-suit patent damages.

New on Patently-O: Does a settlement license trigger the § 287 marking requirement for NPEs seeking pre-suit damages? The Federal Circuit panel had some sharp questions for patent counsel in this latest decision.

1 week ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
The Dark Matter of Patent Law: Nearly 25% of Office Actions Now Cite Secret Prior Art Empirical study of 233M citations shows secret prior art is growing, but the legal measure overstates the practical problem by about a quarter.

New on Patently-O: A striking empirical study of 233M citations reveals that nearly 25% of office actions now cite secret prior art. But does the legal measure overstate the practical problem? Read our analysis.

1 week ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement
The Symmetry Problem: Printed Matter, Nexus, and the Federal Circuit’s One-Way Ratchet Federal Circuit hears EagleView v. Nearmap on whether printed matter doctrine can be used to defeat secondary considerations nexus showing.

The Federal Circuit tackles a thorny question in EagleView v. Nearmap: can the printed matter doctrine undermine secondary considerations evidence of non-obviousness? A new analysis on Patently-O explores the implications.

1 week ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
X Marks the ... Stick Figure? Federal Circuit Says One DuPont Factor Can Outweigh All Others Federal Circuit affirms no likelihood of confusion between cigar maker's X marks and vape company's stick figure design, holding mark dissimilarity alone can be dispositive.

Surprising takeaway from the Federal Circuit: when trademark designs are sufficiently different, that alone can resolve a likelihood of confusion case. The court just said X marks and stick figures don't mix. Read the latest on Patently-O.

1 week ago 3 0 2 0
Moving Target: When Amended Claims Outrun Your Standing Declaration Federal Circuit dismisses PGR appeal in ironSource v. Digital Turbine, holding petitioner must link injury in fact to substitute claims, not just originals.

New on Patently-O: The Federal Circuit just raised the bar for PGR challengers. In ironSource v. Digital Turbine, petitioners must now establish injury to substitute claims, not just original ones. A critical reminder that amended claims can outpace your standing argument.

1 week ago 1 0 0 0
Again with the Redundancy: Although MPHJ's claim might be obvious, HP can't pursue that argument HP v. MPHJ (Fed. Cir. 2016) Over the past few years, MPHJ has raised the ire of many with its …

Throwback: Why HP couldn't use an obviousness defense against MPHJ's patent enforcement campaign, even if the patent was obvious. A classic Patently-O deep dive into patent litigation strategy and the limits of available defenses.

1 week ago 0 0 0 0
How the Federal Circuit Is Rebuilding Inventorship Law After the AIA The AIA repealed § 102(f) but inventorship invalidity endures. Tracing the defense from 1790 through Fortress Iron and AI.

Inventorship invalidity survived the AIA's repeal of section 102(f). Patently-O explores how the Federal Circuit is rebuilding inventorship law from 1790 through Fortress Iron and AI in our latest post.

2 weeks ago 2 0 0 0
Missing Coinventors and the Death of a Patent Federal Circuit holds patents invalid when missing coinventor cannot be found for § 256 correction. A case of first impression with AI implications.

New on Patently-O: A Federal Circuit case of first impression raises troubling questions about patent validity when a coinventor cannot be located for correction under Section 256. What does this mean for AI-generated inventions?

2 weeks ago 2 0 0 0
Most Common First Names of inventors on US Patents Gif showing most common US patent inventor names 1910-2026. We know that in the US women have a lower rate of patenting. In addition though, parents are much more conservative in terms of male names.  

Fascinating data: we've animated 116 years of US patent inventor names. Women patent at lower rates, but there's another trend - parents choose far more conservative names for boys. See which names dominate the patent landscape on Patently-O.

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Words That Stick: Prosecution Disclaimer Survives the Examiner's Rejection Federal Circuit holds in Puradigm v. DBG that a prosecution disclaimer stands even when the examiner rejected the disclaiming argument, extending the disclaimer to logical variants of disclaimed prior art.

New on Patently-O: A Federal Circuit decision in Puradigm v. DBG clarifies that prosecution disclaimers stick - even when examiners reject them. The ruling extends disclaimers to logical variants of prior art, reshaping claim interpretation strategy.

2 weeks ago 2 1 0 0
Defend Trade Secret Act Moving Forward by Dennis Crouch I am always amazed how gridlock is pushed aside to implement intellectual property laws.  In a unanimous vote yesterday, the …

Throwback to when the Defend Trade Secret Act sailed through the Senate unanimously. A rare moment of IP law consensus that created a federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Revisit this classic Patently-O analysis on how gridlock gave way to landmark legislation.

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
USPTO's April Fool's Prank Says the Quiet Part Out Loud USPTO's April Fool's MATTHEW AI tool for eligibility is a joke that maps precisely to real policy on Alice, SMEDs, and AI examination.

The USPTO's April Fool's joke about an AI tool for patent eligibility might be funny - but it perfectly mirrors real policy on Alice, SMEDs, and AI examination. Read the full analysis on Patently-O.

2 weeks ago 4 0 0 1
Advertisement
Guest Post: Improving PERA's Eligibility Exclusions Professors Lefstin and Menell propose revisions to PERA's eligibility exclusions, focusing on nontechnological utility and adding a research exemption for natural materials.

New guest post on Patently-O: Professors Lefstin and Menell examine PERA's eligibility exclusions and propose important revisions, including addressing nontechnological utility and adding a research exemption for natural materials.

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
GW Law Seeking IP Fellow for Frank H. Marks Visiting Position GW Law is accepting applications for the Frank H. Marks IP Law Fellowship, a visiting professor role and launchpad into IP legal academia. Apply by April 24.

Great opportunity for IP lawyers! GW Law is hiring a Visiting IP Fellow through the Frank H. Marks fellowship. Perfect for launching an academic career. Applications due April 24. Learn more on Patently-O.

2 weeks ago 3 4 0 0
The Nexus Trap: Why Component Patents Struggle with Objective Indicia Federal Circuit affirms PTAB in MRI v. Squires, finding patent owner failed both tracks of the nexus test for objective indicia of nonobviousness.

The Federal Circuit just made it harder for component patent owners to prove nonobviousness. In MRI v. Squires, the court affirmed the PTAB's finding that the patent holder failed both tracks of the nexus test for objective indicia. Read the full analysis on Patently-O.

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 1
Preview
Disclosed but Still Secret? The Federal Circuit Weighs Patent Publications Against Trade Secret Claims Federal Circuit weighs whether prior patent disclosures of penile implant design concepts destroy trade secret protection under California law in $21M case.

Federal Circuit tackles a tricky question: Can something be both publicly disclosed in a patent AND protected as a trade secret? A $21M case involving penile implant designs shows why this matters. Read the latest on Patently-O.

3 weeks ago 4 2 0 0
Preview
Two Voices on § 101: Agency Guidance Meets Judicial Skepticism New cert petition challenges Federal Circuit's § 101 reversal of PTAB eligibility finding that the USPTO Director personally defended on appeal.

New on Patently-O: A fascinating clash emerges as a cert petition challenges the Federal Circuit's § 101 reversal - one that contradicts the USPTO Director's own appellate defense of the PTAB's eligibility finding. Agency guidance meets judicial skepticism.

3 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Bipartisan Skepticism Greets Director Squires at First House Oversight Hearing Director Squires faces bipartisan skepticism at House oversight hearing on IPR institution policy, retroactive de-institution, the Board of Peace trademark, and Secretary Lutnick's role in PTAB reform.

Director Squires faced tough questions from both sides of the aisle at his House oversight hearing. Key topics: IPR institution policy, retroactive de-institution, and PTAB reform. Read the full breakdown on Patently-O.

3 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Prototype Enough: Even More Expansion to the ITC Domestic Industry Framework Federal Circuit affirms ITC exclusion order against Apple Watch, expanding domestic industry doctrine to allow iterative prototypes and circumstantial evidence.

The Federal Circuit just expanded the ITC's domestic industry framework in a major Apple Watch ruling. Iterative prototypes and circumstantial evidence now count - a significant shift in patent enforcement. Read the latest analysis on Patently-O.

3 weeks ago 1 1 1 0
No Do-Overs: Federal Circuit Blocks Dismiss-and-Refile Tactic to Restart ITC Stay Deadline Federal Circuit holds that an ITC respondent cannot dismiss and refile a declaratory judgment action to restart the 30-day mandatory stay deadline under 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a)(2).

Federal Circuit closes a procedural loophole: ITC respondents can't dismiss and refile a DJ action to reset the 30-day mandatory stay deadline. A key ruling on strategic litigation tactics. Read the full analysis on Patently-O.

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Knowledge Isn't Enough: The Supreme Court Rejects Expansive Theory of Secondary Copyright Liability Supreme Court reverses $1B copyright verdict against Cox, holding mere knowledge of users' infringement insufficient for contributory liability.

SCOTUS just reversed a $1B copyright verdict against Cox Communications. The Court ruled that merely knowing about user infringement isn't enough for contributory liability. A major shift in secondary copyright law. Read the analysis on Patently-O.

3 weeks ago 6 1 0 0

Stay ahead in patent law. Patently-O premium gives you full access to expert analysis, breaking news, and in-depth commentary. Subscribe today and never miss critical insights. https://patentlyo.com/login-2

3 weeks ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement