Video where this dude is spitting facts about who actually really did what regards Gaza and Iran, including a lot of stuff I've tried to get through the skulls of far leftists myself over and over.
I'm not tryna make a habit of it but I'll fuck with federalism just this once
ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics...
Jamie Raskin has filed briefs supporting his motions for the court to appoint an amici to contest vacating the convictions of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Here's the Proud Boys version ...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
If we voted for Democrats consistently, we would have what we did back in the FDR era last time we did that, or things like my MA state gov that made us one of the best states in the country.
But the left would rather mass murder-suicide via Republicans to "send a message to Dems", so here we are.
That last line is just so incredibly true, and incredibly sobering.
We angry joke about how the far left wants things to get so bad we have a revolution, but the irony is it's more that we collectively as a nation keep voting for Republicans to make things so bad we then have to vote for Democrats.
Had my friend commiserate with my Bluesky gripes by sharing one of *his* friends noting the left is so deep in Purity Testing and a willingness to "die being 'right'" that "the only time Democrats can win even in a 50-50 country is when ridiculous percentages of normies get mad about life sucking".
What charisma politicians need, should revolve around brokering deals with their fellow lawmakers. Not acting like dog and pony shows.
The president themselves does need a bit more charisma, but even there they need the charisma of a diplomat, not a wrestling show leader or w/e.
I do think this idea that politicians should be celebrities was one of the dumbest ideas we ever came up with.
They're lawmakers! Their job is to listen to constituents and make laws. That's what you need to be selecting for, folks.
I've definitely noticed that one of the things that seems to really piss people off is that I do in fact stick to my guns and relentlessly no-sell attempts to drag things away from the thing they're dodging (or if it gets too bad to ignore, start calling out their dishonest tactics).
Also, *checks logged out*, I love the crybullying about "circular argument" when what actually happened was they tried to dodge answering the second part of my question and didn't like me sticking to my guns and no-selling the dodge.
IOW: Grow the hell up and act like grown-ass adults who understand how to take responsibility for your intentional free will actions and the end results you thus intentionally chose to bring about.
Stop trying to pass blame like little immature babies.
If you idiot toddlers want to instead vote for Republicans over and over, then you need to accept you intentionally voted for Republicans to govern or obstruct so you get the Republican government/obstruction you intentionally voted for.
If you idiot toddlers want Democrats to be ambitious, then you need to do this thing called "voting for them" so Dems have this thing called "the actual power they literally require to do those ambitious things".
Correct, if the reason the party is weak is voters intentionally voted for them to be, then you factually correctly blame voters, you got it.
You all need to stop being idiot toddlers who want to vote for Republicans but have Democrats somehow magically save you and magically govern for you anyway.
So I guess how it goes is the person gives me a response that suggests they wrongly think Minority Leader is just a prize for their favorite person versus an actual job, some subjective opinions about Schumer, then going poof in a bunch of smoke before answering the "tangible difference" part. Cool.
And blocked, so, OK, that was a fun little excursion I guess. Don't let the door hit you on the way out?
OK, cool, that's your subjective opinion, but I didn't ask for your subjective opinion, I asked for tangible results and details
I asked for an objectively provable take.
How does any of this matter to producing tangibly different results?
Yeah, like, my take is it's not that I'm tied to Schumer, it's that I think all the problems right now are pure math and so not tied to anything Schumer or anyone else could do, so I think people are flailing at the wrong thing.
But, as always, I'm open to new information so we'll see how it goes.
OK, we got that answered.
Now, what specific thing with a tangible positive effect would he do that Schumer isn't doing?
I regularly feel strongly like I started out in one universe where everything works correctly, but during my birth went through a portal to a mirror universe.
As I'm sick of how everyone always claims the exact opposite of what actually happened, or how everything otherwise works exactly backwards.
I will say I have at least seen people who suggest people for the House, like AOC or Crockett. I don't think either of them actually want the job, but the suggestion exists.
But I don't think I've ever once seen anyone suggest who the Senate Minority replacement would be.
OK, which specific person are we putting there instead, who 1. actually wants the job, 2. could provably do something that is tangibly better than what Schumer's doing?
I don't think I've ever seen anyone ever answer that.
But apparently in our mirror universe where morality magically works the exact opposite way from in the real universe, doing #3 which protects black men is somehow magically "racist" while doing #1 & #2 which screw over black men is somehow magically "not racist".
TI-effing-L
Not only that, but even if it did... people still use it anyway, so.
She could:
1. Try to ban it and start arresting black men who use it
2. Let black men who use it get scammed and ripped off
3. Ensure that anyone who does use it is at least protected
"Sorry I tried to back up your virulently racist attitude, eff this person for not being racist like us"
- you rn
Yeah, I disagree with people who are either virulently racist, or have Democrat Derangement Syndrome so bad they're willing to sound virulently racist just to somehow bad faith dunk on a Democrat, you got it.
"Hi I'm virulently racist and think it's dumb that you're not also virulently racist"
You rn
@KamalaHarris Black men deserve a president who cares about making their lives better. HARRIS-WALZ POLICY Kamala Harris will create an Opportunity Agenda for Black Men Provide 1 million loans that are fully forgivable up to $20k for Black entrepreneurs and others to start a business Support education training, and mentorship programs that lead to good-paying jobs for Black men, including pathways to become teachers Protect cryptocurrency investments so Black men who make them know their money is safe Launch a national health initiative focused on the illnesses that disproportionately impact Black men Legalize recreational marijuana and create opportunities for Black Americans to succeed in this new industry
Today's discourse:
Far leftists are so desperate to shit on Harris that they stated the virulently racist claim that this post of Harris suggesting things that would objectively help black men was an example of her "bad messaging".
(Dude who did it blocked me, so we're airing it this way.)
Today's discourse:
My inbox is currently being filled by far leftists who are literally hopping mad Harris wanted to ensure that any black people who used crypto didn't get scammed or ripped off.
They're so deep in Harris Derangement Syndrome they're being virulently racist and refuse to stop.