reverse chronic logical order 😂😵💫
Posts by Marc Reeve
supporting evidence for the previous skeet
considering how much Willie has partaken over the years, you might get pretty faded if you did this
Check the intro - Myron Floren *definitely* knows that this song is about
It’s the way to be
This one really gets to the point quickly
Lots of people did buy it, though
Corn tortillas were commonly used as a substitute for matzo by crypto-Jews in the Americas, so there’s support for the theory that they are. (The Inquisition considered eating corn tortillas during Passover as evidence of cryptojudesmo, anyway.) Flour tortillas are leavened, though.
The tuner/amp right behind the stool there was the heart of my dad’s hi-fi system for years.
Boy, you can tell this guy’s hit rock bottom.
I mean, it’s about drugs in general, but the album title tells you what’s important
There are no hobbits in this song, but there is pipeweed.
What, subtle?
You may be familiar with the more radio-friendly version of this song recorded by “Musical Youth” in the ‘80s
I don’t know about that fresh air, I think there was a skunk around somewhere
Acapulco, probably
We’ll pick you up and take you away…
Inevitable
Sittin’ around the campfire…
For the record, so to speak, it’s Tony coughing at the beginning.
It has always amused me that the first side of “2112” is this grand epic, and then side 2 opens with “weed hur hur hur”
And we all know what you get when you multiply 35 by 12, right?
Never had problems with the beans, it's the greasy taco meat that causes me issues. Which is why I usually swap for beans.
Consider the video that's been going around of the humanoid robot tripping over the tape marking the starting line and exploding as it hits the ground. (We love to see it.)
obligations, suggesting it had no intention of complying.34) Of course, if Respondents never change their conduct, and the USAO behaves like it has never lost, it will continue to lose cases. (Such intransigence is the plain import of its own dismissive statement that only “this Court”—but ostensibly not Respondents or the USAO—is guided by Gopie.35) But such positions come at tremendous cost—besides the human toll on the individuals who are illegally detained for hours, days, and months in unspeakable conditions at places like the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”)36—in
the form of loss of confidence in the Government lawyers who appear in this District.37 That is not just in the credibility of their presentations, but in the belief and understanding that lawyers for the Government are not just like other lawyers. The USAO has already been described by this Court and others of playing whack-a-mole with people’s lives38 by trying to forum-shop habeas cases out of this District. That loss is accentuated when the USAO seeks to shroud in darkness the conduct of the ICE officers here. Its view is that the Court should not even hold a hearing to determine the basic facts of Petitioners’ detentions. No final remedy has been suggested, by the Court or anyone else. And none beyond a final granting of the writ may be appropriate. Yet, the USAO delays or finds excuses to avoid producing officers for a basic fact-finding hearing. And these are not the only cases where it has taken the same approach.39 Such hide-the-ball litigation tactics corrode both the Court’s and the public’s confidence that Respondents are even trying notionally to adhere to constitutional requirements.
This is not to say that the position of the USAO is not difficult—caught between its obligations to the Court, the public, and the Constitution on one hand and the demands of ICE on the other.40 But here, we are not talking about the USAO being forced to mimic the unreasonable position of its client agency. The USAO’s approach here—suggesting it does not have any obligation to revise plainly unconstitutional practices, even if they have been documented in case after case, and it can try to avoid a fact-finding hearing—badly confuses the obligation of a Government lawyer with that of any private advocate. “A government lawyer ‘is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy,’ the Supreme Court said long ago in a statement chiseled on the walls of the Justice Department, ‘but of a sovereignty whose obligation . . . is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.’”41 “The Supreme Court was speaking of government prosecutors in Berger, but no one . . . has suggested that the principle does not apply with equal force to the government’s civil lawyers.”42 And this obligation means, at a minimum, that the USAO has “a duty to
37 For example, in one case before the undersigned, a 64-year-old man who has lived in the United States for 23 years, who is blind and the primary caretaker of his 85- year-old mother (who is a U.S. citizen, as are his siblings), was arrested while getting coffee, after law enforcement asked if he recognized someone in a photograph, and he answered in Spanish. Pet. for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Gonzalez Franco v. Almodovar, No. 26-CV-1429 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2026), Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 22–23. He had no criminal history, but was detained at the MDC from January 30, 2026, until the Court granted the writ on March 12, 2026. Order dated Mar. 12, 2026, Gonzalez Franco v. Almodovar, No. 26-CV- 1429 (E.D.N.Y.).
With alt text
Have we found Thomas Benjamin Wild's Bluesky account?
Yes, she did musical theater when she was younger and then pursued serious voice training because she wanted to sing opera.
And, of course, the first chapter is somewhat based on Anne McCaffrey’s own experience in musical education (ten years of voice training, only to be told she would never be a soloist.)
Heh, I didn’t process the NATO alphabet the first time. 3-2-1-GTFO
Stark was hit by the Iraqis, though, as were most of the tankers. We only started caring when the Iranians started attacking tankers going to Iraq, which was three years into the war.