If you define sharia law as “laws restricting personal liberty due t o the dogma of the dominant religious ideology” then basically each conservative state

Kansas revoking trans people’s licenses comes to mind

Who's your favorite...

...starter?
...pokemon?
...eeveeloution?
...legendary?

This got me crying

oh my gosh this is gorgeous i need it???

In that they don’t believe trans women are men yeah

This is exactly what OP describes, that the judgement had no bearing on those who did not have GRCs, including under-18s

what exactly are you asserting is the misinformation

To me that's better than them not being able to join at all

If they’re really so upset about having to make this change what’s stopping them from making an “officially separate” Trans Girlguiding organization that isn’t actually separate where out and proud trans girls can still join

You also do not have a right to decide that some women are men just because they look ugly to you

Kelly lost

It’s not harassment for someone to exist near you just because they have a protected characteristics that you lack

“How many genders are there”
Biden: At least 3 get out of here

“Should trans people have access to trans healthcare”
Harris: I think we should follow the law

One of these people won their election

oh i get it you can still summon synchro tuners

WtF is this franchise

If a business in the UK has mostly trans clientele does the EHRC expect them to have extremely long lines at any gender neutral restroom with mostly empty single sex facilities?

This seems logically sound but remember the rules are arbitrary when it comes to us

"Trans men will have to use the women's" was only a problem for them if they were logically consistent and had any integrity, they were always planning to kick them out too

They’re not going to publicize their private medical information just to make you more comfortable

Sure, having to harass people who don't look woman enough is safer.

The court decided that there aren't any heterosexual trans people too so who cares what makes sense anymore.

Now there is a requirement to doubt people who say they're women

In practice this is primarily going to affect women who aren't trans but look masculine, as they're significantly more common than trans women

It's more that previously buisnesses were allowed to accept that people who said they were women were women

Anyone who was a safety issue was removed for being a safety issue, regardless of gender

Previously if someone “looked trans” there was no obligation for the business to remove them

Now there is

Which obviously means that it’s drastically more likely that a woman who isn’t trans will be removed because she looks masculine

I think you’re just being obtuse

If this is true then the best case scenario for a trans woman is to pass and use the women’s restroom, completely disregard the guidance

They’re going to stand out and possibly be removed from the men’s for sure, at least here there’s a chance they can go without incident

Does this mean it’s fine for a trans woman to be there if none of the other women feel harassed or terrified?

if I visit the UK and someone “reasonably thinks I’m a ~biological male~” they first ask to see my birth certificate, which says female, so if they still don’t believe me they take me to a back room and ask if I have a GRC

… but I’m American. I don’t have a GRC. What happens then?

kissies.

#homestuck #pepsicola

Update: Jenny now has a Gofundme. Please help Jenny to gather enough to save her life and escape the USA!

www.gofundme.com/f/urgent-jen...

What if you gave the both the king and queen neat hats that made them look like the other, then got your opponent to agree to let you play with their spots swapped but you don't actually

So when they finally checkmate your queen you can one up them

What do you do when you're writing and you paralyze yourself because you feel like you're mischaracterizing your own characters

> Membership of an association of 25 or more people can be limited to men only or women only and can be limited to people who each have two protected characteristics.

Would such an association exclusive to trans women have to exclude trans women if it described itself as limited to women