Most people think of bulls as very direct, but they are definitely capable of innuendo

I am personally blockading all of my posts , quote posts, and replies in response until we reach a powerful and in many ways wonderful deal

More like Bill O’Dryly

You're Gen X. You can bring back one thing from the 80s. What is it?

It’s hard to get that guy off the couch

Two years after its launch, this very serious company is 1) trying to roll out an AI security system monitored 24/7 by humans, and 2) trying to figure out how it could work.

Sappy but true

You’re right, changing my practice area might be going out on a limb

I only do criminal law but maybe I should branch out

Ursinsurance Fraud

I think the Charlotte Hornets just need a lil power nap

Dennis Lee never fails.

A meal served on an American warship in the strait of Hormuz region during the Iran war blockade. There is very little food on the tray, and it looks very unappealing

The extreme lethality of Pete Hegseth’s Department of War is most impressively demonstrated by its Navy Culinary Specialists

An article posted on Facebook by the hill, showing a photograph of Steve Bannon and the headline “Bannon advises Hegseth to tone down Bible talk it steps on what’s important”

Ever see two drunks arguing about something they won’t even remember tomorrow?

Four big bowls containing homemade bibimbap

Who up bibimmin’ they bap?

Sean Connery in his role as Indiana Jones’s father in the movie Indiana Jones, and the last Crusade

“We named the DOG Mark Mobius.”

Who can afford good posts these days?

Goatsezilla

A five dollar Fugazi concert ticket

FUGAZI walked so Eddie Vedder could run

A photograph of Donald Trump and Laura Loomer standing next to each other giving thumbs up gestures

Isn’t Laura Loomer essentially a Death Doula (with benefits)?

More like Def Doula

A bowl of green lentils with big chunks of ham and a sausage on top.

We just went to Paris for a week and had SO MUCH incredible food. However, a dish I keep thinking about was one of the cheapest and most simple: this bowl of green lentils with ham and sausage.

I think what she’s saying here is, “you guys paid me to come give you a soundbite on “no tax on tips,” and if you want me to go beyond that, I’m gonna need another grand or two.”

Good for her for knowing the Art of the Deal.

post a pic of yourself as a doctor challenge

In the example above Roy is not the accused on trial but I understand what you’re saying. Def. an argument that it’s being offered to show affect on listener, not truth of the matter asserted. But then you still have confrontation objections to contend with. Might some judges still let it in? Sure.

There’s one too many layers of hearsay in that hypo for it to be admissible (before you even get to the confrontation objection). But because a defendant’s statement is admissible under the “admission of defendant(party opponent)” exception to hearsay, Roy can testify to what defendant told him.

Totally. I’m not trying to correct you in any way, btw, just adding to your comment and trying to further distinguish the ideas of evidence for “public opinion and political purposes” use versus evidence that can be used at trial. The thread seemed to be conflating these.

There’s confusion (not in bad faith) in this thread between whether something is “evidence” in the broad sense of the word, or “evidence that is admissible at trial.” For example, a statement by a defendant to police under conditions that don’t violate Miranda is admissible at trial.