Fractures Emerge Between GOP’s Pro-Pedophilia, Extremely Pro-Pedophilia Wings

Oh, the Guardian is platforming transphobes again

Who will be the largest party after 7 May? 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

It's a two-horse race between:
✅Plaid Cymru with a positive vision for our nation
❌Reform UK with their Trumpian politics

Vote Plaid Cymru to stop Reform and stand up for Wales ✊

The Shadow Contract | Good Law Project Exposing why a US spy-tech firm is at the heart of the NHS Listen on these platforms Support our investigative research Fund more investigations Keep me informed Spread the word

"The Shadow Contract investigates how one of the most powerful surveillance companies in the world is being handed sweeping access to your NHS data - quietly and without your consent."

Listen here 👇🏻

Two cheeks of the same arse.

Because he knew he was a friend of a notorious paedophile, he knew he was dodgy as fuck, and he should have known that he failed national security vetting.

He didn't have a friendship with Trump. They shared a paedophile friend but that's it. It's unlikely Trump even knew who he was.

Trump didn't even want Mandelson, he wanted Karen Pierce to stay.

I see people are still peddling the Trump whisperer excuse.

Mandy acheived nothing.

And even if you are devoid of morals, don't care about the UK's reputation, and think that it was politically expedient to appoint someone to appease Trump - Trump wanted Karen Peirce, not Mandelson.

Be serious.

Labour and Reform, two peas in a pod.

The idea that you need to send corrupt sociopaths as Ambassadors to DC is so funny, because it's a standard we have never applied anywhere.

We don't appoint corrupt gangsters to embassies in Moscow or religious fanatics to Tehran.

Also, Mamdani is able to handle Trump fine without becoming him.

Palantir in the NHS is linked to Mandelson

Mandelson is linked to Wes Streeting

Wes Streeting is defending Palantir’s involvement in the #NHS

Nothing to see or everything to see

Palantir must be removed from the NHS

Yeah. It was public knowledge when Mandelson was appointed that he maintained a friendship with Epstein after his conviction but even if it wasn't, everyone knew how dodgy he was

The line at the time was that it was a clever move to appoint the Trump whisperer. Turned out to be bollocks, didn't it.

Telegraph newspaper editorial on Mandelson's appointment in December 2024 versus editorial today

Against the recommendation of UK Security Vetting. That is the issue, as I'm sure you know.

What we know about Peter Mandelson's vetting and security clearance The former US ambassador was given a security clearance despite concerns being raised during checks.

The JP Morgan report contained evidence that he stayed at Epstein's house *while Epstein was in prison*.

"At the time [of his vetting] it was public knowledge that the peer had maintained his relationship with Epstein after his conviction"

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

Guardian article from June 2023 on a 2019 JP Morgan report saying that Epstein "appeared to have aparticularly close relationship with Prince Andrew the Duke of York and Lord Peter Mandelson"

It came to light about 18 months before Starmer appointed him.

A couple points on this manifesto, apart from the racial superiority subtext others noted.

Palantir is a company built on public contracts, they bill the state billions to surveil and target the state's population. The manifesto exists to justify their demand for even more.
/1

Her office said the Office for Students (OfS), which regulates universities, had received reports of speakers and lecturers being harassed and blocked for holding gender-critical or religious views, of foreign interference suppressing academic freedoms, and of ideological belief requirements featuring in job advertisements.

The OfS will be able to use the new complaints scheme from September. From April, it will be able to fine universities the greater of £500,000 or 2 per cent of their income, which would amount to millions of pounds for large institutions, for breaches under the Freedom of Speech Act. Ultimately, universities could be deregistered for egregious cases.

Bridget Phillipson will introduce new laws to make it possible for Universities to be fined millions of pounds if they don't silence students who protest bigots invited onto their campuses. It's like the Tories never left office.

The people who wrote that won't be sharing the cost, they will be perfectly safe and making *lots* more money.

Unchecked capitalism inevitably leads to scenarios where people die en masse because it generates financial profit for a small minority.

Yeah, demanding national service is really something a tech company should be doing.

Going from 18% to >30% in a few weeks is highly unlikely. That kind of change either requires a major crisis like war or covid, or a particularly popular leader promising to reform. None of which they have.

I don't even think it's likely that the gap will get smaller, let alone be overturned.

But you're only looking at the factors that would count in Labour's favour.

Starmer would be ripped apart in a TV debate. On the more superficial things like Mandy but also on the cost of living, the support of war crimes and other major things people care about.

I think it's much rarer to find someone who doesn't know how it works than it is to find someone explaining how it works to people who already know.

The underlying point is that winning the support of 34% of voters and <20% of the electorate obviously means the vast majority doesn't support you.

I disagree, obvs, but apologies for making assumptions. Bad habit.

Sorry if I came across as impolite but I don't see how any of this fits with polling.

If there was a GE called tomorrow then we could expect some shift but it might not favour Labour and the gulf is massive anyway. Even taking FPTP in to account, Labour winning a majority is highly unlikely.

Highly speculative but I can imagine a scenario where neither the red or blue tories have a majority.

IMO Labour are less likely to want any kind of agreement with the Greens/SNP/Plaid/Lib dems than the Tories are with Reform. We already know Labour would prefer to lose than deal with the left.

I always expected them to be consumed by the Tories before the next election but a coalition now seems the most likely scenario.

Not just that, they won a huge majority of seats on a third of the vote but have spent the whole time pandering to Reform.

What is the point of having a majority of you're not going to use it?

A joke government from a party run by people whose main goal is not to govern but to supress moderates.

Did you know?

The Israeli Occupational Colonizer Fascist Force used a bulldozer to rip a teenagers body apart while he was alive?

True story.

This is who and what Zionists like Chuck Schumer support, but they won’t ever talk about it.

Also RIP #RachelCorrie!
euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6...

Always someone with pretty distasteful views who thinks they themselves are a good egg simply because they don't like Nigel Farage