Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Marco Palombi

Preview
The Galileo Moment Every major intellectual revolution has a Galileo moment: when the object of inquiry becomes clear, the method takes shape, and the formal language adequate to carry the new questions is still being f...

Every major intellectual revolution has a Galileo moment: when the object of inquiry becomes clear, the method takes shape, and the formal language is still being forged.

www.ocrampal.com/the-galileo-...

#programming #psychology #AI #intelligence #cogsci #philpsy #neurosky #philosophy

2 days ago 3 0 0 0
Preview
The Ground Beneath the "I" There is an I you feel. Located, bounded, looking out at the world from somewhere behind your eyes. Geneosophy is not interested in that I. It is interested in what makes that I possible, the generati...

There is an I you feel. Located, bounded, looking out at the world from somewhere behind your eyes. Geneosophy is not interested in that I.

www.ocrampal.com/the-ground-b...

#programming #psychology #AI #intelligence #cogsci #philpsy #neurosky #philosophy

2 days ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
The Question AI Will Never Ask We have become master cartographers of the "given." By scaling computation, we have built maps so vast and detailed that we often mistake the territory for the grid. But as the dialogue between the AI...

We have become master cartographers of the "given." By scaling computation, we have built maps so vast and detailed that we often mistake the territory for the grid.

www.ocrampal.com/the-question...

#programming #psychology #AI #intelligence #cogsci #philpsy #neurosky #philosophy

4 days ago 4 0 0 0
Preview
From Plato to Gradient Descent: The Frame We Forgot We Chose Practitioner: I’ll be honest—I find the "philosophy of AI" a bit indulgent. We aren’t guessing anymore. We’re building systems that work. GPT, AlphaFold, Sora... these aren't accidents. We’ve clearly ...

We talk endlessly about what AI can and cannot do. We talk very little about the assumptions built into the question itself. This dialogue follows a philosopher and an AI practitioner.

ocrampal.com/from-plato-t...

#programming #psychology #AI #intelligence #cogsci #philpsy #neurosky #philosophy

1 week ago 5 1 1 0

They invested so much money; they have to keep the ball rolling. I have friends who are terrified. They do not understand the underlying technology, and they believe what these guys say. One of them told me: "The best minds on the planet are investing trillions, it must work!"

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

yes, that's why they'll become programmers. They'll have to check the code. It's a probability non-reasoning tool. Should be used as such.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

Possible short term, but longer term there'll be more programmers.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
There Will Be More Programmers, Not Fewer AI won't reduce the number of programmers. It will create millions more, because running code you cannot understand is not programming. It is faith. Part I — The Hypothesis The Democratization Arc,...

AI won't reduce the number of programmers. It will create millions more, because running code you cannot understand is not programming. It is faith.

www.ocrampal.com/there-will-b...

#programming #psychology #AI #intelligence #cogsci #philpsy #neurosky #philosophy

1 month ago 5 1 1 1
Preview
Too Narrow to Be Wise: The Tunnel Vision Trap of Modern Expertise We live in a Kafkaesque paradox: the very people we turn to for wisdom about life’s biggest questions—meaning, society, the future of humanity—are systematically selected for their inability to think ...

Society has lost its direction. We are now driving blind, and the reason is reductionism. We’ve become so obsessed with breaking the world into tiny parts that we’ve forgotten how the whole thing actually hangs together.

www.ocrampal.com/too-narrow-t...

#SystemsThinking #Reductionism #Holism

1 month ago 5 0 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Chasing Our Own Tail: Self-Reference and the Limits of any Academic Discipline Marcus Doubtful, a physicist turned philosopher. Richard Trad, a mathematician turned philosopher. Both have spent decades thinking about the foundations of knowledge, but they've reached very differ...

In the rush to scale neural networks, we have fallen into a category error: believing that a perfect simulation of an intelligent behavior is the same thing as the existence of intelligence itself.

www.ocrampal.com/chasing-our-...

#ArtificialIntelligence #PhilosophyOfAI #CognitiveScience

2 months ago 4 0 0 0

We moved to the 'bottom-up' statistical approach, only to find ourselves frantically retrofitting those same rules onto a black box to stop it from hallucinating.

2 months ago 4 0 0 0

LLMs hallucinate? Groundbreaking discovery: a statistical model works statistically. 😉 It’s the ultimate tech irony.

We abandoned GOFAI because manual rules couldn't handle the messiness of reality.

2 months ago 5 1 1 0

Spot on!

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

The programmer-turned-architect still needs to understand programming.

2 months ago 2 0 0 0

You can't make architectural decisions without comprehending the constraints and trade-offs of implementation. The executive assistant still needs to understand business communication. The accountant still needs to understand accounting principles.

2 months ago 2 0 1 0

This doesn't eliminate the programmer, it transforms them into architects. But here's the crucial point: they still need to know how to program.

You can't architect systems you don't understand. You can't debug code you can't read.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

The tools eliminated tedious manual tasks, but the roles themselves weren't eliminated. They were elevated.

The same pattern applies to programmers. LLMs can handle boilerplate, generate first drafts, automate simple tasks.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

Word and Excel vs LLMs.

Secretaries became executive assistants, their role evolved to higher-level coordination, communication, and decision support. Accountants gained the ability to do far more analysis, strategic planning, and advisory work.

2 months ago 3 0 1 0
Preview
From Sophists to Alchemists to AI Coders: The Technique Without Understanding We believe we are at the cutting edge of history, but we may just be repeating its oldest mistakes. From the Sophists’ empty rhetoric to the Alchemists’ blind experimentation, humanity has a long hist...

AGI is Our Generation's Alchemy, And We're Too Arrogant to Admit It

The AI industry has a dirty secret: we're building toward Artificial General Intelligence without the faintest consensus on what intelligence actually is.

ocrampal.com/from-sophist...

2 months ago 4 0 0 0

Spot on!

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Yes. Retrieval is not understanding. I use them and they help. But one should not consider them intelligent.

2 months ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
The Understood-Understanding Gap: Why LLMs Hit a Wall Large Language Models have become ubiquitous in knowledge work, yet a curious pattern has emerged. Talk to consultants at McKinsey, BCG, Bain, and you'll hear the same refrain: "I don't really know ho...

LLMs are masters of the "Understood"—the vast library of human output. But they lack "Understanding"—the creative spark that generates those concepts in the first place.

www.ocrampal.com/the-understo...

#philosophy #science #psychology #AI #intelligence #cogsci #philpsy #neurosky

2 months ago 4 1 1 1
Preview
The Shared Delusion: Both doomers and dreamers assume current technology leads to AGI. They’re both wrong Excel didn’t kill accountants; it gave them better tools. Yet, with AI, we’ve abandoned this logic in favor of a collective fantasy. We’re treating a sophisticated calculator as a human replacement ra...

Excel didn’t kill accountants; it gave them better tools. Yet, with AI, we’ve abandoned this logic in favor of a collective fantasy. We’re treating a sophisticated calculator as a human replacement rather than a human multiplier.

www.ocrampal.com/the-shared-d...

#philosophy #AI #intelligence

2 months ago 4 0 0 0

If you’re happy to discard creativity, infinite regress and circularity as problems and instead embrace them as the 'geometry' of existence, then we’ve reached the bedrock of our disagreement. At that point, there isn’t much more I can add, except, perhaps, to wonder who (or what) wrote the code ;-)

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

Furthermore, he failed to develop a formal framework to express that transcendental intuition. That is precisely what applied Geneosophy provides.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

I’ve already linked a blog post where I discuss Kant, Bergson, and Husserl. In a nutshell, Kant had a 'Geneosophic' intuition regarding the transcendental, but he assumed a priori categories and the 'thing-in-itself', both of which are unnecessary.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

It is a new paradigm. We have begun publishing an introduction to the theory; however, we aren't yet sure when we will release materials on 'applied Geneosophy' due to IP considerations and related factors.

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

The alternative is comprehending the conditions for you to think in terms of mathematics and much more.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

In very simple terms: while thinking in terms of computation allows you to express the relations between Concept X and Concept Y, Geneosophy allows you to comprehend the conditions for thinking about Concepts X and Y in the first place.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
The End of the Machine Metaphor: A New Framework for Intelligence and Living Organisms A Journey Through the Paradoxes of Reductionism and the Promise of Geneosophy The Pattern Behind the Paradoxes Modern knowledge has achieved extraordinary success. We’ve mapped the genome, simulate...

What does 'exist' even mean? In any case, if you’re interested, that is precisely what Geneosophy explores: www.ocrampal.com/the-end-of-t...

2 months ago 0 0 1 0