Scumbag Dad is a shining example of how when you do something ironically over and over again, it eventually stops being ironic

Little rat dog
And his
Little rat man
And their
Little rat car

Comments turned off lmaoo

Eric Swallowswell

Man fuck that shit

Just delete it what are they gonna do beat you up

What the fuck else are weapons for lmao

A map showing the NYC subway 1992 vs today. Zero lines have been added, despite the claim that we need fares to expand service.

I've been assured we can't have free transit because we need the money to expand service.

Describe the first sentence I wrote in your own words so I know you understand it

Those two sentences have literally nothing to do with one another. I've been working on my left-hand layups and I'm getting better

Jesus Christ you're figuring this out on the fly aren't you

I thought fares were about keeping the criminals out?
The whole money argument would be more believable if you people were advocating for making every road a toll road. And yet, despite being free, roads keep getting built.
Bad transit is a policy decision. You get paid to keep transit shitty

People only say "agree to disagree" when they know their position is indefensible and think politics is low-stakes

Because people like you are in charge

Me when propaganda works

That's 200,000 people. You want one bureaucrat to process 200,000 people?

The turnstile doesn't discriminate between "legitimate poors" and "illegitimate poors," dipshit. The only reason you're employed is because your job is to maintain a status-quo of transit being too underfunded to garner high ridership which is then taken as proof that transit shouldn't be funded

Starting a YouTube series where I just go to transit conferences and ask the people if they drive to work

How many applicants do you expect this lone bureaucrat to handle?

This is specifically an economic deterrent. The purpose of a machine is what it does.

Numbers, Jack. How much are you paying this one bureaucrat and how many applicants do you forsee them processing?

Fares-as-crime-deterrent uses poverty as the sole determinant of whether someone will commit a crime, which both is ineffective and constitutes collective punishment. You see nothing wrong with this arrangement because you view poor people as inherently criminal

What budget are you working with for this means-testing? How much are you paying these bureaucrats that it's cheaper than just making transit free?

"The research" bitch YOU'RE the one doing the research. The guy who just spent the last hour arguing that the point of fares is to keep poor people out because they shit on the floor and rob people

This also excludes the "nice" poors who also don't have money, jack

That's not what I asked, idiot

How do fares differentiate between the good poors and the bad poors, dipshit?

JackTatt 🇨🇦 comment that reads: "No it doesn’t. It boils down to what is the most efficient use of existing transport funding giving finite funding and other priorities like healthcare, education, and housing. We only want to keep criminals and antisocials off public transit, but most poor are just as polite as the rest."

It is my firm belief that Canadians are a spiritually fascistic people, and I have yet to be shown otherwise.

How's that "prioritizing housing" going, btw?