In one night, activists flipped a council to 'no' on a data center. How did they do it? They tracked down the addresses of council members who had been voting 'yes. At 1 am, they visited one house, and then made a ruckus! They hit pots and pans and sang protest songs. They left flyers at neighbours' doorsteps revealing that this man was planning to go against the will of the town. They did this at the homes of two council members, and the next day they flipped their vote. Neither had listened to the residents' resounding pleas at town hall meetings to *not* allow the construction of the data center. This was a military Al data center that would be used to simulate drone attacks. The stakes could not be higher.
If your council members are not listening, why not consider taking a well-planned strategic action like this? Why let tensions run up so high, and residents feel so helpless, that one might actually decide to *shoot bullets* at their front door as a warning signal? This goes for all leaders failing to listen to us, and going ahead harming our families with reckless Al development projects. What if the guy who threw the Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman's gate had instead thrown balloons filled with red paint? Sam's roof covered in red paint to symbolise the teens who had died by his recklessness. Red paint to symbolise the schoolkids and mums who'd die if he continued his dishonest Pentagon war contract. Red paint thrower would raise an uproar. Seething techbros would portray him Sam's wannabe assassin. Legally, it would be vandalism, and he'd be put into jail.
But if the guy made all the effort to not hurt anyone, and instead took the jail and pain onto themselves, can anyone really blame them for speaking for the public? All this hand-wringing about ordinary folks cheering the Molotov cocktail at Sam's gate feels misplaced. Yes, let's not condone violence. But also let's not shelter this rich authoritarian dude planning to harm our families.
Thoughts on nonviolent confrontation of leaders: