Doubling down on fossil fuels won't save us from rising energy bills - but it would be terrible for our climate.

Alex Chapman on BBC Five Live this afternoon.

Yes I can't possibly understand why they aren't being murdered in the polls for suggesting raising our spend/GDP ratio up to.... The EU average.

The economics of air transport in Europe Part one: Air transport and growth

Full report here: neweconomics.org/2025/11/the-...

💥 A big caveat. Our economic model does NOT include the climate driven economic impacts - that will be considered in Part Two - so all outcomes are actually worse than stated. Our model does NOT include equity of impacts - that will be considered in Part Three - and who benefits really matters. /13

🛫 In Cluster 4: Capitals and already well-connected regions. There are signs of saturation in both directions. People here don't need more connectivity. Chances of finding a causal relationship driving economic growth: 29% /12

🛫 In Cluster 3: Tourism sending regions of northern and western Europe. Business air demand is way down. Most regions have a travel spending deficit. Chances of finding a causal relationship driving economic growth: 23% /11

🛫 In Cluster 2: Mainly tourism recipients. Business air demand is down. Air transport remains important to bring tourism, but the quality of that tourism matters. Chances of finding a causal relationship driving economic growth: 59% /10

🛫 In Cluster 1: Mainly eastern Europe. Business air demand is still rising. Incoming tourism is lower, and so are incomes and pre-existing connectivity. Chances of finding a causal relationship driving economic growth: 53% /9

To help characterise the air transport-economy relationship across European regions, we applied a statistical clustering approach to create four distinct groupings (map below): /8

⭕ But even in tourist receiving areas, the relationship isn't as strong as it used to be. Declining duration of tourist stay and the rise of informal accommodation, overtourism and land/rent rises, have reduced the value it brings./7

⭕ Why? A major factor is the decline in business use of air travel. It's accelerated since the pandemic, but was already stagnant in most of western Europe prior to that (Figure below). /6

⭕ but... that causal relationship, relied upon to promote airport expansion and resist aviation taxation, is hardly present in northern and western Europe./5

⭕ In a minority (37%) air connectivity growth drives economic growth. These regions are mainly found in Eastern Europe and tourist *receiving* areas. This is the impact policymakers want, and the industry lays claim to./4

⭕ In the majority of European regions (53%) economic growth drives air transport demand. Higher incomes create demand for outbound leisure travel. This may create a welfare benefit to flyers, but not a wider economic benefit. /3

⭕ Yes, air connectivity and GDP per capita are correlated. But causation, direction and location are too often ignored (and in 11% of regions they are negatively correlated!). /2

🔔 New study🔔 What is the relationship between air transport and economic growth in Europe? Dr Felix Pot and I break it down like never before in our new report for @neweconomics.bsky.social and T&E: /1

Check out our senior economist @alchap.bsky.social on the Energy Revolution podcast talking airports, economic growth and the climate crisis. Full episode available here: linktr.ee/energyrevolu...

I did my first episode on the NEF podcast 🫣

Now, in the eyes of this gvt, he is a supporter of a terrorist group. The proscription of PA is clearly stupid and must be repealed. Even more urgently the gvt must stop gaslighting us and actually respond in a manner proportionate to the genocide Israel is perpetrating against Palestinians.

My dad was arrested in London yesterday for holding a placard saying "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action". He's a retired university lecturer who is involved in his local church. Prior to yesterday's demonstration his only legal infraction was a speeding ticket for doing 36 in a 30 zone.

Below is a fresh cut of my favourite graph. Air trips per £million real GDP, with linear trend lines. The world has changed, but will the government catch up in time? /ends

If this question can be asked without any reference to the climate issue, then when we fold in the astronomical level of emissions (enough to wipe out the entire benefit of the Clean Power Plan in 5 years) then it should be an open and shut case. /3

"growth is from the likes of flights to the Greek islands and the Caribbean — up 77 per cent since 2019."

"if Heathrow’s growth is mainly direct leisure flights, how does it make sense to spend tens of billions on a third runway" /2

Heathrow’s investment plan punctures the third runway myth The airport has admitted the decline in business travel is permanent, and wants to spend £10bn raising passenger numbers by only ten million

The right questions getting asked. This week in the Times, Alistair Osborne punctures the myth that a third runway at Heathrow is "crucial for business". Why? Because of the CEO's admission that the "decline in business travel appears to be permanent.../1 www.thetimes.com/business-mon...

Yup, Lauren would have won easily. Curtis only showed up on the scene shortly before selection process kicked off many of us had no idea who he was. Lauren had massive support from all wings of the local party, not just 'the left'.

This just in. Kemi thinks the actions of Palestine Action at Brize Norton might have stopped a war crime...
Not sure she fully thought this one through 😂

You've heard of frequent flyers, but we've got some new research for you on the idea of ultra- frequent flyers.

Exciting work from my colleague @alchap.bsky.social where he makes a compelling case as to why this new class of flyers is not paying it's fair share of tax and how we can fix it. 👇👇

There's broad public support for net zero by 2050 & people are concerned about the impact of the climate crisis. So let's deliver net zero policies that benefit ordinary people rather than calling it into question. @alchap.bsky.social spoke to LBC News in light of Tony Blair's comments.

Quote from Alex Chapman, senior economist: Growing Luton will not deliver the economic growth the government so desperately wants. Business air travel has collapsed over the last few years and even the airlines admit it isn’t coming back. Instead, expansion at Luton will see another 8m UK residents taking their money overseas on holiday instead of spending it on UK high streets. This is even though the UK already has enough capacity for 300 million passengers to fly in and out every year.

🚨The government has given Luton airport approval to expand.

This is despite the fact that it will do very little to boost economic growth and will be devastating for our climate goals. @alchap.bsky.social responds.

somewhat tongue in cheek here but I saw this and was reminded immediately of @alchap.bsky.social talking about the negative impacts of air travel expansion