Thanks Tina for highlighting! @brionylatter.bsky.social
Posts by Sam Hampton
This Talking Climate features excellent research by my colleague @samhampton.bsky.social & others on the power of everyday climate leaders & communicators. In this case hairdressers.
With my background in the arts & humanities, it was such a joy to see mine and @samhampton.bsky.social's hairdressers and climate change work picked up by German conceptual artist Martina Geiger-Gerlach!
➡️ www.eci.ox.ac.uk/news/hairdre...
@cast-centre.bsky.social @ecioxford.bsky.social
I was filmed for some promo for mine and @samhampton.bsky.social's new research into hairdressers as everyday influencers on climate change and sustainability.
Lovely to have insights from Harriet Barber from sustainable hair salon B Hairdressing too.
www.bath.ac.uk/announcement...
New CAST report on "Hairdressers as ‘everyday influencers’ on climate change and sustainability", by Dr Briony Latter (@brionylatter.bsky.social) & Dr Sam Hampton (@samhampton.bsky.social). 📣💇
Read the report: cast.ac.uk/wp-content/u...
Key messages thread 🧵
Hairdressers as ‘everyday influencers’ on climate change and sustainability
For those who have a narrow view of which jobs can help tackle the climate crisis, here's a report on hairdressers in sustainable salons and the conversations they have with customers.
cast.ac.uk/wp-content/u...
By @brionylatter.bsky.social and @samhampton.bsky.social
✦✦ So true — conversations with our hairdressers matter. New paper from @brionylatter.bsky.social & @samhampton.bsky.social shows how everyday interactions shape climate thinking ✂️🌍
➡️ Link in comments ✦✦
Front cover of journal article
Public engagement and climate change: exploring the role of hairdressers as everyday influencers
⭐New paper!⭐ Two research projects exploring the influence that hairdressers—as widespread professionals in conversational spaces—have w/ clients about climate & sustainability.
doi.org/10.1057/s415...
A graphic with the Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations logo at the top left. Large text reads ‘We are hiring!’. Below, text states: ‘Position: Research Fellow. Institution: University of Bath. Deadline: Monday, March 16th.’ A blue button at the bottom left says ‘Apply now’. The CAST logomark, a multicoloured circular line of patterns appear on the right side.
CAST job opportunity: Join us as a Research Fellow at our centre hub, the University of Bath, leading a programme of quantitative behavioural research to advance understanding of climate-relevant behaviour change & life choices. 📣
Deadline: 16 March 2026
Apply now 👇
www.bath.ac.uk/jobs/Vacancy...
New CAST & ISCC PhD studentship at the University of Bath: "Understanding and addressing public resistance to ambitious #ClimatePolicies". 📣
You'll have the opportunity to work with our CAST Director Prof Lorraine Whitmarsh MBE & affiliate, Dr Sam Hampton.
Deadline: 18th March 2026 📆
Apply now 👇
👉 Which problem framing resonates more with you?
👉 And what does that mean for the solutions you think are realistic or desirable?
I think the value of this is not to decide who is right or wrong, but to notice the assumptions we and others bring to research, policy, and practice.
I then ask the room to vote. Unsurprisingly, the outcome is quite different amongst different cohorts. The Engineers I teach tend to agree with the first problem framing, whereas Geographers usually subscribe to the second.
Framing 2:
Climate change is a human–nature problem.
It reflects deeper patterns in how we extract, consume, and relate to the natural world.
Net zero alone won’t fix biodiversity loss, inequality, or resource depletion.
Framing 1:
Climate change is a greenhouse gas problem.
It’s fundamentally about pollution.
Cut emissions as fast as possible.
Try to solve everything else at the same time and we get tied up in arguments and achieve very little.
What problem are we actually trying to solve when we talk about climate change?
I ask this every year in my first energy systems lecture.
It usually splits the room.
A new paper on "Measuring carbon capability beyond the carbon footprint" has been published, led by Alisa Ghura, alongside CAST's Dr Sam Hampton & Prof Lorraine Whitmarsh MBE.
It argues for going beyond consumption to recognise influence, roles, and the capacity to shape systems.
Read the paper 👇
@yasminsachdev.bsky.social
Yes, and Steve is part of the research team. Absolutely, we need leaders with integrity and so be willing to talk about their own behaviours, or indeed the struggles of low carbon living
Why do people support or oppose bike lanes? 🤔🚲
In an article for The Conversation UK, CAST's Prof Wouter Poortinga (@wouterpoortinga.bsky.social) sheds light on public opinion of bike lanes, referencing his study of UK-based tweets about cycle lanes and LTNs from 2018-2022.
Read the article 👇
And on that, we also need high profile leaders to demonstrate personal commitment to low carbon living. We’re also working on this! leadership.climate.ox.ac.uk
@lwhitmarsh.bsky.social @bath-iscc.bsky.social
Personal carbon footprints are useful — but they tell a very incomplete story about individual climate action.
Our new paper argues for going beyond consumption to recognise influence, roles, and the capacity to shape systems.
Open access: www.nature.com/articles/s44...
New, by Alisa Ghura @samhampton.bsky.social & @lwhitmarsh.bsky.social
Most UK residents act as though they have limited capacity to cut emissions. A new method maps habits and public efforts to show who can drive change.
@bath-iscc.bsky.social@ecioxford.bsky.social 🧪
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Our open-access paper with colleagues Will Eadson, Richard Blundel, Andrea Byfuglien, Katherine Sugar, Hannah Bamford, @brionylatter.bsky.social & Ben Hardy-Jones explores this in more depth
Curious what others think: have we missed any roles for meaningful business climate action? 💬
These roles aren’t just for big corporates. Every business, whatever its size or sector, can find itself in this framework.
But if we want businesses to step up, we need markets, regulators and policymakers to make it easier for them to act.
1️⃣ **Consumer** – cut your own emissions
2️⃣ **Enabler** – offer low-carbon products or services
3️⃣ **Influencer** – shape expectations and norms
4️⃣ **Citizen** – engage in place-based and civic initiatives
5️⃣ **Investor** – direct finance toward positive climate outcomes
Small and medium-sized businesses tell us they feel overwhelmed: too many acronyms, standards, and schemes competing for attention. Where do you start?
To cut through the noise, we reviewed the research on business climate action and distilled it into 5 clear roles any business can play 👇