Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by

Preview
Senator Wiener Expands AI Bill Into Landmark Transparency Measure Based on Recommendations of Governor’s Working Group Official website of Senator Scott Wiener, representing California Senate District 11.

See the full press release here: sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/senato...

9 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

And I saved the best for last

9 months ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

@TeriOlle of Economic Security California Action

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

@SnehaRevanur of Encode AI.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

CEO of Elicit @stuhlmueller.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Prolific startup founder @snewmanpv.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Nobel Prize winner @geoffreyhinton.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement
Post image

Bruce Reed of @CommonSense, and also President Biden's former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Very lucky to have @Yoshua_Bengio's support.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0

Glad to see @Scott_Wiener's SB 53 picking up support from top scientists, startup founders, and civil society leaders. A thread.

9 months ago 1 0 1 0

SB 53 is an important step forward. See the full text here: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billT...

9 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

The bill includes provisions on policies and reporting of risks from internal deployment of AI systems. This mirrors a recommendation in Governor Newsom’s report that I was very happy to see.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

As the Report recommends, SB 53 also provides the Attorney General the authority to update the definition of “large developer.” But the Attorney General is expressly forbidden from covering companies that aren’t well-resourced or are behind the frontier of AI development.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

SB 53 applies only to large AI developers that have trained a foundation model with 10^26 floating point operations (FLOPs) of compute. This means companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars on AI development.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0

Finally, SB 53 continues to include provisions on whistleblower protections and a public cloud computing cluster, CalCompute, which were present in SB 1047 last year and have been widely popular.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement
Post image

Third, it requires large companies to report a set of critical safety incidents caused by their AI models to the Attorney General.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Second, it requires large companies to report on the risk evaluations they are doing for catastrophic risks. This includes justifications for releasing risky models, sometimes called “safety cases.”

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

First, the bill requires the largest AI companies to have, publish, and follow a safety and security protocol. This mirrors voluntary commitments that companies have already made.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image Post image

SB 53 is focused on catastrophic risks, defined as a small subset of risks that could result in more than 100 deaths or injuries or more than $1B in damages. The Report warned that evidence for these risks is “growing.”

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

In 2024, in the wake of his veto of SB 1047, Governor Newsom established a working group to study how California should respond to risks from advanced AI systems. The working group recently returned a report, which SB 53 draws from.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Today, Senator Scott Wiener introduced an amended version of his frontier AI legislation SB 53. Secure AI Project is proud to co-sponsor this important legislation, which follows the recommendations of the California Report on Frontier AI. A thread.

9 months ago 0 0 1 0

An important step forward for California. Thank you, Senator Wiener!

9 months ago 0 0 0 0