Nobody reads this shit anyway.
Posts by
Today has been one of those days where I’ve wanted to die. I won’t, but I’ve wanted to.
Triggered by trying to reach out and be part of the kink community, and failing. And feeling like I won’t ever succeed. When you feel weird and different even in a kink space, it’s pretty devastating.
Honestly, also here for the well-fitted T-shirt content.
If #Trump actually believes that doctors heal people by the laying on of hands, that just makes it worse.
Hadn’t actually tried this one just yet but seeing how great everything else is… *downloads*
You’re the owner, and the cage is owned… are you sure you have that right? 😏
I’m a good boy. I need to be controlled. Thank you @meltinghypno.bsky.social
Chastity shorts + muscle + anonymity = MORE BOYS SHOULD BE IN THIS STATE INCLUDING ME *books gym*
Your day could be worse. You could be an Italian football fan.
I am very sorry you have to put up with the kind of unscientific nonsense you saw me trying to interrogate in a couple of places.
I will see if I can find a link to the original interview. But it’s a person who was assigned male at birth because he has a penis but internally he menstruates. Both are primary sexual characteristics not secondary.
Just popping back to observe that you’re now saying the original author used an outdated and possibly offensive term.
It really is interesting how no matter how many times I point out that it wasn’t me that originally referred to “intersex women”, it doesn’t seem to register.
Otherwise, I’m done.
How does this person fit in your system? Note the discussion of primary sexual characteristics. Primary. www.instagram.com/reel/DQP4mqS...
I do know what secondary sexual characteristics are. Do you? Because apparently you think that “sexual characteristics” only exist in secondary form, not primary. You, the person who is yelling at me about how everyone is either male or female.
I really do have to point out to you again that I am not the person who came up with the term “intersex women”. If you think they ARE female, then the observation that they ought to participate in the right sporting category is trite. Whereas if you think they are male… why on earth call them women?
It’s you who obviously don’t understand. I said nothing about “secondary”.
You seem to be avoiding the word intersex which is interesting when the entire fucking point of this conversation is a reference to intersex women. I’m not the one lacking reading comprehension skills here.
It’s isn’t sarcasm. And I didn’t mention any specific athlete. That isn’t how rules and principles work.
So we agree that there are intersex women with enough female characteristics to be accepted into female competition. Excellent. Now, I’d like to know whether the original author agrees.
I am simply asking her to express her position. We are agreed there exactly 2 categories of sporting competition available, male and female. Why would saying which category “intersex women” belong in be difficult? Do you often find it difficult to choose between only 2 categories?
Which sport category do you think “intersex women”, your term not mine, should participate in? It’s not difficult.
I have to purely for the purpose of illustrating the author’s logical gap in categories.
Frankly you seem to be using “intersex women” as a synonym for “males with DSDs” in a way that denies the very existence of FEMALES with DSDs. And that was my original point. Defaulting all people with DSDs to male is simply illogical.
You are the one who talked about intersex women as if they were a separate category. Not me. I get the feeling you don’t actually understand what the word intersex means. People who have a mix of characteristics of the two sexes have to be sorted into one of those two sexes.
The fact that you can talk about intersex people and then say they can participate in the category that matches their sex is a spectacular bit of cognitive dissonance.
We have 2 categories for sport. There is no 3rd “intersex” category. Defaulting all intersex people to “male” is illogical.
We can add “intolerance” to the words you don’t use correctly. In straw man arguments with circular logic involving assumptions about who counts as a woman.
Bye. Really. I won’t reply any more because it is such a waste of time.
My attitude towards you has absolutely nothing to do with your gender. It’s possible to find men who are just as unwilling to consider the complexities of gender. I would similarly conclude that talking to them is useless.
You won’t watch the video. So I won’t waste time providing other links.
A person who clearly ignores a link you’ve already offered doesn’t get to demand more links. It would be such a waste of effort.
Still haven’t watched the video have you?
Bye.
You know, just because you say words like “clearly” and “obviously” isn’t going to override the actual scientific literature that says you are wrong.
Plus since when is height a criterion here? Are you going to start policing female basketballers?
I’m done. You’re not interested in science.
They aren’t. If sport is divided into 2 categories, there is a need to deal with the fact that not everybody neatly fits. But SCIENCE says the boundary is complex. Picking one single thing as the boundary is not for the benefit of the affected people, it’s for the convenience of administrators.