Lidl Deluxe are an eggcellent choice.
Posts by Jack Russell
Another interesting comparator would be the same question but for "British values". I'd like to know which are similarly ranked and where the biggest divergences are.
Again, an interesting question is how these numbers would compare to the equivalents for "universal human values" or "universal ethical/moral values". But it would be less ambiguous to be explicit about what values you're talking about in the first place.
The interesting question is how these differ from people's perception of universal moral human values (if at all). It would also be interesting to see a version of the side by side which shows odds ratios between groups instead of two absolute values with deltas that can just about be surmised.
Oh yes and Belfast too, AVA in the slipways - probably was there with you!
Just seen them at Glastonbury so far, but that was some gig. Looking forward to the second time at All Together Now in Waterford this summer.
Funnily enough I think this particular story has itself provided more of an incentive. I would imagine more clients will now ask about fraudulent respondent detection, to avoid getting egg on their face as the Bible Society now has (largely thanks to human error at YouGov).
Yes that was what I was asking really - just using the term as an umbrella for questions in that broad space i.e. church/state separation, attitudes to more muscular Christianity etc. Looking forward to seeing the results!
Have you examined attitudes to Christian nationalism? I'd love to know overall feeling and also how your segments' opinions differ on it.
Sounds like a feature, not a fault.
For England, and other 3D combos for NI, Scotland and Wales.
I was thinking about this the other day and was quite pleased to realise that a tetrahedron was required for four parties. But easier to visualise the triangle for three groupings. Would be interesting to plot constituencies, maybe with lab / con + rfm / ldm + grn as the three dimensions?
MattGPT does have a certain ring to it. And the fact that it's GB News calling him that is also strangely satisfying.
They're also probably the best at setting up bots to answer surveys fraudulently, I'd guess.
Are there more details on the errors themselves?
Based on the current seat totals of each party, that would result in the following seat totals post-LE2026:
LAB: 3,954
LDM: 3,399
RFM: 3,240
CON: 3,188
GRN: 1,391
Which would be insane.
One of the Guide badges is called "Human Rights".
It literally says, "They belong to everyone, no matter where they’re from, what they believe or how they choose to live. They aren't optional."
You can't make this 💩 up.
I've got some money on the Lib Dems doing better than the markets expect 👍
For LE2026 I do think we might see quite a few more chaotic, less organised/tactical outcomes. Because as you allude to, voters will feel more empowered to vote with their heart. However, I doubt many sincere Labour voters will switch. Especially where Reform don't seem likely to win.
The other point I'd push back on slightly is that "For many, this may mean they can finally vote for the party they prefer, now also a newly viable choice." Surely this will be balanced by ~equal numbers now feeling that they need to swap away from their preferred party to maximise bloc chances?
An important point succinctly made. I do think there is a lot riding on the proviso that voters will be able to identify the best placed party in their bloc. I would imagine that will be harder when 5,000 elections are taking place simultaneously than for a single well-publicised by-election.
The recent attack on our website and the lgbtiqa+ books we recommend has reminded us how much supportive voices matter. If you believe in inclusive books and diverse reading for all children, please consider linking to our website on your website or social media. Thank you. https://schoolreadinglist.co.uk
schoolreadinglist.co.uk
Zelda. Hands down best switch game. You've got breath of the wild then tears of the kingdom to enjoy. It's probably the best game series of all time, and those are the last two installments and both are epic.
We've just launched our brand new animation for schools! 'What is secularism' explores what secularism is and how it protects freedom of belief for everyone, and enables people with different worldviews to live together in an increasingly diverse society. #secularism🧵
humanists.uk/2026/03/17/w...
🚨 It's the last day to submit evidence to the RE review panel in Northern Ireland.
If you don't live in NI you can email your submission to re.review@education-ni.gov.uk .
Please add your voice before it closes!
#TeamRE #UKEd
@natre-update.bsky.social
Non-religious people – humanists, atheists, agnostics, non-theists of all descriptions, are not any less likely to be empathetic, or more likely to be ignorant, mistrustful or fearful. There is really good research on this here: www.explainingatheism.org
Are you suggesting that the increasing number of people with no religion lack empathy for those of faith? This is a pretty offensive generalisation in my opinion. The reason that people "see threat" is that several actors are currently stoking fear of the other.
This secularism does not mean anti-religious. It is a political position on how we should organise society given a plurality of worldviews. It advocates that no worldview be privileged. Under secularism, all religious groups as well as the non-religious have equal rights and protections.
I disagree. Firstly, secularism is a word with many meanings. You seem to be choosing the one which means anti-religious, predominantly used in the US. Two more positive definitions, common in the UK, are given here: understandinghumanism.org.uk/secularism/ and www.secularism.org.uk/what-is-secu...