🚨 Just a couple weeks to go! 🚨
The QCTiP Conference kicks off April 23rd — where the brightest minds in quantum computing theory & practice collide ⚛️
#QCTiP2025 #QuantumComputing #CountdownBegins
🧵(1/4)
🚨The registration deadline for #QCTiP2025 in Berlin is this Friday! Don't miss out—secure your spot now: qctip2025.com/registration... 🎟️
Registrations are now open for #QCTiP2025: qctip2025.com/registration....
Don’t wait too long—spots for participants without a talk are first-come, first-served!
I believe this is mainly because on StackExchange there's a competition to write clearly and concisely. If you don’t answer a question clearly and concisely, someone else will. In contrast, academic papers have less incentive for clarity and brevity. 2/2
I've recently gotten back into the habit of checking QCSE for QEC posts. On average, I learn more from reading QCSE than from reading the arXiv. 1/2
Christopher pointed out that I didn't define fault-tolerant syndrome extraction. I've updated the question now.
Is there a known fault-tolerant method for measuring an arbitrary multi-qubit Pauli operator on a 2D square grid of qubits?
I deliberately left out a space or time constraint. For simplicity, assume the Pauli operator acts on qubits located along one of the boundaries of the 2D square grid.
Submissions for QCTiP 2025 are now open.
Also useful for showing something doesn't work. Just need to run one counterexample instead of hunting for a mistake in a proof.
No delays, long live the arXiv 🙂
One reason I believe this could be useful is because I like defining codes by properties of circuits implementing them.
The advantage of a definition in terms of circuit properties is that it can answer: is this circuit implementing a color code/surface code/something else?
Been here 5 minutes and nobody posted a screenshot of their google scholar, so far, so good.
I write down the answer to flashcards
I answer flashcards in my head
Out of curiosity, a poll on memory systems. Like the post that applies to you.
