Historical Analogy and the Role Morality of Reason-Giving Authors Darrell A. H. Miller, Duke Law SchoolFollow Document Type Article Publication Date 3-18-2024 Subject Category Law Abstract The Supreme Court has turned ever more to analogical reasoning from history and tradition to decide significant matters of public policy. Nowhere is this phenomenon more evident than in the Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. The Court’s crafting of a Second Amendment test that turns almost entirely on the strength of analogies—and on a topic of such intense public salience—has thrust analogical reasoning to the forefront of judicial and academic debate. While many have questioned the workability of Bruen’s focus on historical analogs, this Essay is less concerned about the pragmatics of Bruen and more focused on the ethical implications of this type of reasoning.
NEW | Prof. Darrell A. H. Miller, a Con Law and Second Amendment scholar, discusses the perils of relying on analogical reasoning in applying SCOTUS’ new 𝘽𝙧𝙪𝙚𝙣 test — and how to avoid them — in his Duke Law Journal article “Historical Analogy and the Role Morality of Reason-Giving.” ➡️ duke.is/m/q5ec