Soooo...
Navy Secretary John C. Phelan is leaving Donald Trump's administration, effective immediately.
Wonder what war crimes he's refusing to commit in Iran?
Sounds totally normal for the Secretary of the Navy to leave during Donald Trump's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, right?
🙄
Only because RFK Jr is in the news...
Jeffrey Dahmer had a well-documented fascination with roadkill, dead animals and anatomy, which many psychologists view as an early warning sign of future morbid behaviors. He collected roadkill, often bringing carcasses home to dissect and bleach their bones.
HAHAHA! That response killed me. And it's so damn true.
Person: how are you? Me: im ok Person: why just ok? Message appears: you are not an experienced enough friend to unlock this response yet. try again after reaching friendship level 10. Source: beewatch
@beewatch
I mean I am not a lawyer but it sure looks to me like "intent to commit freedom of speech"
Yeah it's a good thing he doesn't have the launch codes for Americas nuclear arsenal or I'd be on anxiety medication and I'd never sleep again OH WAIT
Gotta say, Iran's president pretty much got this one right.
I would be hard pressed to even begin to prove the theory that the dipshit genuinely cares about the health and well-being of any person on Earth, including himself.
So naturally he doesn't give a shit about American war dead. Hell, he'd probably laugh and cheer if someone nuked San Francisco.
Trump has shrugged this off, along with the 13 (that we know of) deaths, because he thinks his illegal war is worth it.
(Aragorn from LOTR is holding his sword in the upright position.) A DAY MAY COME WHEN I GET ENOUGH SLEEP AND DON'T NEED COFFEE BUT IT IS NOT THIS DAY
☕ c h e e r s 🗡️
This is why I have trouble taking some of you seriously when you wring your hands about preserving the legitimacy of the Court.
The Court is much less concerned with its own legitimacy than you are.
We Should Have Finished Reconstruction: A Brief History Of American Politics, 1865-2026
oh shit
So what you're saying, RFK Jr., is that the dipshit doesn't know how to do math and you don't either
bessent's bullshit here feels close to criminal
All that time and money and effort, danger and risk? Trump did this.
When do we stop calling it stupidity and start calling it malevolence?
My experience with Glenn Beck's "redemption" leads me to think that maybe Tucker might be a lying bag of crap.
badastronomy.beehiiv.com/p/ban-393-a-...
It's a really important point to make that the modus operandi of the current GOP is built on the idea that the democrats will follow rules that don't apply to them and they can do whatever they want and the democrats can't. When that shifts, they're completely clueless and start thrashing.
The Trump administration, from top to bottom, is filled with spiteful malicious bullies who insist that they're innocent aggrieved victims.
And I'll repost it every time I see it, because it should have been the Turning Point we now so desperately need. Thank you, @mjfree.bsky.social
Hey, I could stand to lose some followers as long as they're pathetic little manbabies who won't hold other men accountable to stop rape culture
Well, because I deeply enjoy answering rhetorical questions with deeply obvious answers, I'd say the guy that faked his assassination attempt.
Which would be bitterly humorous right up until we all remember that someone in the audience was hit by the bullet and died.
It took eighty years to get to were we were, and we may never be able to get back, and I don't think that many of my fellow citizens of the United States of America have quite fully grasped what that means yet.
BREAKING: Donald Trump just boosted Democrats’ chances of taking the House.
He said the quiet part out loud, “fair elections” means he loses power.
That’s not a warning, that’s a confession.
We might have lost the future, and it's all thanks to the GOP.
I wouldn't mind the trick for duckduckgo as I've been trying to move away from Google
But this principle has no application to government use of religious language or symbolism. See Lynch, 465 U.S. at 687 n.13 (declining to apply denominational preference cases to city crèche). Nor could it. Consider the cities of Corpus Christi, San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Fe, San Jose, St. Augustine, and Sacramento, to name just a few. Do those names represent “denominational discrimination”? Or take our national motto. See 36 U.S.C. § 302 (“In God We Trust”). Does it show “favoritism” for monotheism over polytheism?
The Fifth Circuit says religious freedom doesn't apply to religious symbols posted by the government because place names exist.
I am not joking.
That is what they said.
Ice just went more covert and less in our faces under Holman and the fat plumber. They are still destroying families.
Quietly.
#pinks #proudblue #bkuecrew #ICE OUT
Here’s your deal on Agency! (I love this cover!)
