Not content with the king suffering the embarrassment of having a sex pest brother, we are sending Charles to visit one who is even worse.
It must be stopped

This picture should be nailed to a cross and resurrected daily 😂

That’s exactly what Murdoch was like. I knew the late Roy Stockdill, the deputy features editor at NoW, and Roy had nothing good to say about him but plenty of bad…

I think they will but maybe they are watching to see how successfully France does this first.
I really hope they succeed

Did Epstein truly take his own life?
Could Melania suffer the same consequences if she rats on the powerful?
I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but if I were her I’d be worried. Maybe that’s why she won’t testify…

Isn’t that the truth! The king is not supposed to be involved in politics, and yet he’s allowing himself to be used as a political pacifier to Trump

Just for the record, the UK has never ever had a “special relationship” with the USA. It’s been used by successive governments as a slogan that the public rarely ever rallied behind.
We have too often been used and abused by the US

Is he really trying to make us believe that buying more gas and oil at wholesale market prices is going to be good for us???? And especially with what’s going on with Iran right now.
He’s not stupid, oh no.
What he is, is a greedy selfish man who would capitalise off bad policies at our expense.

I suspect MK was faced with few choices in her career but to toe the line. We need to get big money and nefarious people out of our news channels and politics

Many years ago, I knew the deputy features editor at The News of the World - a newspaper in the UK that was owned by Rupert Murdoch.
He didn’t agree with anything RM said and did, but it was becoming harder to get work as a journalist as more news outlets were being taken over by rich moguls

I love this! Accurate predictions indeed 👏🏻👏🏻

They are of course right in their statement about diplomatic means, but I have not seen either Trump or Netanyahu show any diplomacy whatsoever.
I think both of them will only understand election polls

I understand the sentiment, but capitalism has been corrupted to favour the few and is not the root cause. Even without capitalism, inequality, greed and corruption would still exist because the problem is one of human nature. We need to bring a more balanced, socially governed form of capitalism

I respectfully disagree. Capitalism can help everyone, but fails when there’s a lack of regulation and enforcement that tilts it too much in favour of the rich. Instead, capitalism should be harnessed to work more fairly for everyone, and it could be.

Capitalism is essential. Private equity is too often the destroyer of capitalism, because it reduces the purchasing power of the consumer

Somebody should make one of these and present it to him

Backtracking on non-dom tax avoidance means that even though it looks like Labour are taxing the rich, they are not. The wealthy middle class are in decline because the richest don’t want to pay taxes.
Labour is not going to achieve much in the long term unless they can be bolder

Another way of looking at it is that Labour was always more than just a party; it was the labour force. Now that the Labour Party has stopped representing them, the labour force is quite foreseeably moving on

Stephen Pollard: The Zionist’s useful idiot

OMG I own a hoodie and that means I’ll never be her friend 😭😭
Yeah, whatever

One of the big political footballs in play. The innocents get a raw deal so that the rich elites don’t get blamed for their failures and greed schemes

Economic threats until we are forced to accept becoming the 51st state?
Yes, he should just piss off

Farage needs to understand that “sovereignty” after Brexit means the UK cannot now be sold as a play thing to the highest foreign bidder, unless he really wants to be seen as a two faced, deceitful little scumbag.

It’s like Farage has let a tyre down on everybody’s car and then says there’s a problem with car tyres going down. He is the cause

I don’t think there’s a straightforward answer to that question, but some things definitely shouldn’t be and don’t need to be monetised. The people that gain from doing it are too often not us…

Mega-donor grip on UK politics has increased 35-fold in a decade, anti-corruption experts warn New analysis from Transparency International UK reveals the scale of politics’ big money problem and calls on MPs to amend the Representation of the People Bill to introduce a meaningful cap on donati...

Preventing any foreign money coming into our political system is vital. Some of it still comes via UK based political middlemen though, and worse still, UK based super rich can still donate vast sums and distort our political objectives.
A good read: www.transparency.org.uk/news/mega-do...

As I said before, I don’t disagree that there are degrees that are not beneficial. But if we move back to a society where only the wealthiest can afford one then we are building in further inequality.
Our economic problems will not be solved by gradual, managed decline

I don’t disagree, but the most essential degrees for science, engineering and medicine should not financially penalise students either.
We should also recognise that music and the arts has generated huge economic gains in the past - there is still a debate to be had over how we should support this

Education at every level is an investment in our economy.
An educated workforce means a bigger middle class and a higher tax contribution, which supports everything else that the public needs.
Successive Tory governments have failed everyone for the benefit of the only richest