Advertisement Β· 728 Γ— 90

Posts by Siddharth Mishra-Sharma

Post image

πŸŽ‰ Great news: Our Machine Learning and Physical Sciences workshop will be back again this year! πŸŽ‰
Keep an eye out for updates on deadlines etc, we will be updating the website soon
ml4physicalsciences.github.io
#ML4PS2025

9 months ago 32 9 0 2
Preview
Inside the Secret Meeting Where Mathematicians Struggled to Outsmart AI The world's leading mathematicians were stunned by how adept artificial intelligence is at doing their jobs

www.scientificamerican.com/article/insi...

10 months ago 3 1 0 0
Post image
10 months ago 11 1 0 0

Implying there was a point before

10 months ago 2 0 0 0

Congrats and welcome!!

1 year ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
Rediscovering One of the Institute's First Women of Color Since 1933, the Institute has welcomed over 8,000 Members comprising scholars from nearly every part of the globe. For many of these scholars, theΒ Shelby White and Leon Levy Archives Center holds some...

www.ias.edu/ideas/redisc...

1 year ago 7 1 0 0

Are you using the API or Console (console.anthropic.com) to get more Claude? (Happy to pass along any feedback...)

1 year ago 8 0 1 0
Preview
2024 letter

zhengdongwang.com/2024/12/29/2...

1 year ago 7 0 0 1
Advertisement

πŸ“£ Hiring! I am looking for PhD/postdoc candidates to work on foundation models for science at @ULiege, with a special focus on weather and climate systems. 🌏 Three positions are open around deep learning, physics-informed FMs and inverse problems with FMs.

1 year ago 78 34 4 4

Yah agreed! Opportunity cost aside, I think a generally nice time as a postdoc, then going to industry seems good from a happiness perspective. It seems likely that regret here mostly reflects a less-than-ideal experience post-PhD (by default for systemic reasons).

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

(If true) I think that's a very specific case, I think industry employers generally don't care or might even weakly prefer fewer years post-PhD

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

I remain a contrarian on this!

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image
1 year ago 10 0 0 0
Post image

Got a photo with a nice branch of my academic family tree: @awehwe.bsky.social @glouppe.bsky.social @smsharma.bsky.social @lukasheinrich.com
Nicole Hartman
@annalenakofler.bsky.social

1 year ago 30 5 1 2
Post image

The papers and posters for our Machine Learning and Physical Sciences workshop at #NeurIPS2024 are online #ml4ps2024. Come check it out on Sunday
ml4physicalsciences.github.io/2024/

1 year ago 111 19 0 7
Advertisement

Poster 4.15, talk 2.30! (Is the schedule shown differently somewhere?)

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Looking forward to catching up with friends and colleagues at NeurIPS next week, as well as meeting new folks -- feel free to reach out β˜•!

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

One hypothesis is that the explicit coarse-graining hurts expressivity, which is preserved when modeling long-range correlations implicitly via the vanilla MPGNN. But not sure -- maybe it's possible to set-up a PointNet-style model to do better!

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Yep, there are long range correlations in the data, and the global parameter $\sigma_8$ should be especially sensitive to them. Indeed PointNet++ doesn't seem to do very well at capturing them despite explicitly having hierarchical downsampling.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

are we getting the greatest hits

1 year ago 2 0 1 0
Preview
A Cosmic-Scale Benchmark for Symmetry-Preserving Data Processing Efficiently processing structured point cloud data while preserving multiscale information is a key challenge across domains, from graphics to atomistic modeling. Using a curated dataset of simulated ...

Fun paper led by Julia Balla: "A Cosmic-Scale Benchmark for Symmetry-Preserving Data Processing".

Julia will be presenting the paper at LoG on Thursday as a spotlight oral, and also at the NeurReps Workshop at NeurIPS Workshop next month.

πŸ“„: arxiv.org/abs/2410.20516
πŸ’»: github.com/smsharma/eqn...

1 year ago 12 1 1 1

Would like to join!

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Post image Post image

blue sky

1 year ago 12 1 1 0