Thanks to my collaborators at U Sydney and OIST. This project began last year at a workshop in Kyoto where Jun presented her work on Bacon-Shor board games. I asked if you could use the same trick with the heavy-hex code. She came back the next day with a schedule presented on a WhatsApp sticker.
Posts by Ben Brown
In the other arxiv.org/abs/2604.14299 we run numerical simulations of larger instances of the code. We show how different choices of measurement schedules trade off threshold error rates for logical errors in the X and Z bases.
In one arxiv.org/abs/2604.14296 we implement a distance-5 instance of the code in an experiment using IBM's heron device Pittsburgh. We also show how benchmarking tools such as ACES can produce noise characterisation data that can be used to improve decoder performance.
Two papers out today: a double feature introducing the dynamic compass code
arxiv.org/abs/2604.14296
arxiv.org/abs/2604.14299
We find novel measurement schedule for the heavy-hex code to find a 2D code that has a threshold against circuit noise and is readily implemented on the heavy-hex lattice.
I wrote many papers on this topic now and each one teaches me something new (One highlight is Kaayva's undergraduate work introducing the Möbius strip decoder doi.org/10.1103/PRXQ...). In our new work I learned matching needs to be combined with other decoding methods for better speed and accuracy.
A link to Kaavya's work here scirate.com/arxiv/2602.2... and my old work with Dom here journals.aps.org/prresearch/a.... Underlying the idea of matching decoders is that of conservation laws and code symmetries. I wrote a perspective on this idea here ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/doc....
Some time ago @domwilliamson.bsky.social and I wrote a paper on decoding fracton codes. This gave us the idea to try to extend MWPM decoding to all codes. We didn't get there yet but work led by @kaavyasahay.bsky.social has made great progress showing a matching decoder for bivariate bicycle codes.
I am watching your conspiracy physics video in December, and you asked for a reminder to cancel your Wall Street journal subscription :-)
Our team at IBM is looking for interns! If you are interested in researching fault-tolerant quantum algorithms, please apply here: ibmglobal.avature.net/en_US/career...
The deadline is a soft one but don't wait around either. Send me a message if you have any questions.
Are you a graduate student looking for experience working on the theoretical problems we need to solve to build a quantum computer? We are currently accepting applications for internship positions in the quantum computing theory team at IBM for summer 2026.
ibmglobal.avature.net/en_US/career...
Congratulations!
To those that may have noticed v1 on arXiv, the published article comes with an expanded discussion on the results as supplemental information. This new material is also included as an appendix on the second version on arXiv arxiv.org/abs/2411.15035. Thanks to the referees for their reviews.
We have 3D color codes with transversal T and CCZ gates, so why not a CS gate as well? Here is one such example to fill that gap. I wonder if it is unique. Unlike color codes with T and CCZ gates, I found I needed to use a new boundary that terminates all string logical operators, but no membranes.
New work just published
journals.aps.org/prl/abstract...
I was sat on this result for a couple of years but as you can see in the acknowledgements sometimes I need to be told three times to get things done (and sometimes I need to be asked more than three times, sorry @kenbrownquantum.bsky.social)
It was great to see you there Ken
Excited to share our first major result from our IARPA Entangled Logical Qubits team!
arxiv.org/abs/2504.07258
@benbrown.bsky.social @universal-soup.bsky.social @evanhockings.bsky.social @georgianixon.bsky.social
Lastly, let me mention that many of our gates start and finish with some planar version of the surface code, so our proposal is compatible with conventional surface code quantum computing schemes. That means we can combine our gates with all of its standard Clifford gates to get a universal gate set
We also find these gates can be scaled to produce arbitrarily good magic states, as we can correct the non-Abelian anyons that are created by errors using a just in time decoder. That is even if our stabilizer measurements are not completely reliable.
Not only that, but our observation showed us how to do a whole laundry list of non Clifford gates in 2D on all kinds of microscopic lattices. In fact we've already run a small instance of one of these gates experimentally arxiv.org/abs/2305.13581.
Are you a fan of fault-tolerant non-Clifford gates on the 2D surface code?
Have you been wondering what was really going on in the protocols by Bombín and Brown?
We have a new work for you: arxiv.org/abs/2503.15751
Logic gates can often be understood in terms of topological phases, so I often felt it was a shortcoming of my work on a 2D CCZ gate that I did not see the analogous physical picture. So I am pleased to share our work arxiv.org/abs/2503.15751 where we show the gate was a non-Abelian phase all along!
Post selection in QEC is not cheating 🤣, but can be scalable and significantly reduce your resources overheads! Check out our newly published paper in @commsphys.bsky.social rdcu.be/d1LuM, a great collab with Sam Smith and @benbrown.bsky.social @sydneyphysics.bsky.social
Our work, led by Riddhi Gupta, was just published in Nature
nature.com/articles/s41...
Thanks to my co-authors for all their hard work.
Thanks. Think I got it. I only got onto bsky a few days ago and I haven't spent long working out how to navigate around it just yet.
Please add me. Also to the superconducting qubit one I think I saw you mention a few days ago.