I already said what this was about the whole time. You are just coping.

You mean where you posted s pic of Rashida Talib?

Bro that is what the argument has always been. You are trying to move the goal posts in the funniest way.

You even posted a picture of a congress representative.

Fucking lol.

No you didn't. And I explained to you why you didn't.

You are just stupid at this point.

Bro who is being dishonest now? That stemmed from "both being pro genocide". This means neither supports. This means that legislation wouldn't pass.

I understand you people are dishonest as duck, but lol.

I never moved the goal post. That was always part of the argument. As I said, for majority to support to support a thing, then policy has to pass that supports the thing. These two directly relate.

You were just arguing to argue.

Yes, majority of support to pass. It didn't pass. Meaning there isn't majority support. This is what I always said. I was always correct. You lose. Thanks for playing.

Fin.

You need a majority to support. I said there is no majority. The bill didn't pass. Therefore there is no majority. Therefore I am correct.

Fin.

Not proof. I already stated that. This is because these things did not pass.

And you didn't prove it.

Because I said you didn't contradict me in as many words before you said the same.

So basically "no u" in response. Nice.

dark humor fans when the humor gets dark:

Cool. Did it pass? No? Thanks for playing.

The point was actions. You have a shit point with an image of one person, when if the whole party truly supported an issue then when they had power shit would get done.

Aesthetics. What matters is actions.

Liberal politicians if you are so disturbed just pretend Charlie Kirk was a Palestinian child and you’ll get over it in no time

I misread that as Charlie KKKirk at first.

What's the text on that?

(I will regret this as math proofs are painful to read.)

"Support".

There you are again! Lmao.

I ain't paying attention to this app, but see you keep replying which is lol

No, but you are. and this convo was always a waste of time.

We may be cooked, I'm afraid.

lol