beautiful

i dont think anyone knows what this means

Per NYT, WH plans to placate conservatives with 3 lib policies.

1. Prioritize international study to women with kids.

2. Mimic Nordic quality-of-life with a cash baby bonus.

3. Horrify Xtians with increased menstrual education.

Odds that they just asked LLM to spit out policy ideas?

they got significantly worse in the present and in the long. terrible trade and the opportunity cost is absurd. as OP states, they could have gotten 8+ first rounders for Luka from a team looking to win a chip now. Totally crazy trade with corruption dripping from it.

who the hell cares? dude is just as psychotic and immoral as Trump.

what are you using to fact check the validity of a tweet?

this seems like an impossible exercise to not poison with bias and subjectivity.

this is word salad and the second sentence has a blatant number disagreement lol
#humanities #princeton #mla

this timberwolves court looks like a giant bird took a shit on a nice TV
#nba #celtics

i think it's an underlying correlation to the low education attainment of Trump's base. Trump has been mostly pro vaccine and vocally proud of his Warp Speed results.

RFK was just a strategic move to get the anti-vax/pharma liberals to vote for Trump.

what promise is that?

if you think the message is "kill them all," you're completely confused about the message.

it's "make the public aware," and it worked.

i think the reason showing this poll is unhelpful to the discourse is because it's misleading in terms of the problems with the health insurance industry.

people are not happy with the healthcare system's reliance on being insured. the insurance, if you have it, is fine.

following this extremely nihilistic logic: if an unhoused person is mentally ill, they actually have a home?

why?

blocked for abusing me.

if you don't think harassment is problematic, you should find another platform.

and I disagree with your sentiment. now please stop harassing me.

you're just calling me terrible things bc I think journalists pub'd in major outlets should be shared here and discussed. that's all I'm saying and you're essentially calling me a bigot.

straw man me all you want, but you're mad at me bc we have different ideas of how discourse should work here.

correction: I don't believe that at all.

do you understand your lying about me? we have likely the exact same views on the issue. you're abusive and unhinged.

it's not an honest question but my answer would be, no.

as it is for every other group that exists.

you accused me of horrible things that are in no way depicted in these screengrabs.

you're a bully and a liar, and you know it. 👎

no I haven't. you're lying and attacking me for no reason.

you're slandering me. why?

I'm not aware of that

and you're blocked for being crazy

👍

no I'm not into any of that. why do you ask?

tbd

yeah by being accepting of discourse, i am guilty of restricting anti-discourse. have fun arguing that in court.